In February, I noted the introduction of a bill that would require any person engaged in the business of commercial financing to provide specified disclosures to prospective borrowers. On September 30, Governor Brown signed the bill, SB 1235, into...
Way back in February, I wrote about a bill, SB 1235, that would impose specific disclosure requirements on persons engaged in the business of commercial financing. In the ensuing months, the bill was amended eight times, including three amendments...
For U.S. Supreme Court followers, a hot topic is whether the Court will continue to apply "Chevron deference". Under Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 467 U.S. 837 (1984), a court will uphold an agency's interpretation of an...
Section 22303 of the California Financial Code establishes the maximum interest rates applicable to loans less than $2,500. The preceding section incorporates by reference the general Civil Code provision about contract unconscionability, Section...
The California Department of Business Oversight administers and enforces the California Financing Law (fka Finance Lenders Law). Visitors to the DBO's website will find a basic description of the CFL, including the following statement:
Richard Cordray's resignation last fall as head of the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau may result in more stringent regulation of California Finance Lenders. In February, Assemblymember Monique Limón introduced AB 2984 as a "spot bill"...
I have often remarked that the California Financing Law (fka Finance Lenders Law) imposes virtually no substantive lending requirements. That will change if Steve Glazer succeeds in enacting SB 1235. This bill would require any person engaged in the...
In a change that escaped my notice, the legislature has seen fit to rename the venerable California Finance Lenders Law as the California Financing Law. This legislation, Stats. 2017, ch. 475 (AB 1284 (Dababneh)), was enacted as urgency legislation...
Yesterday's post chided Glass, Lewis & Co., LLC for its inconsistent positions on majority rule. Today's post tackles a foolish inconsistency in the California Codes. Section 25217(c) of the California Corporations Code provides: