In Archon v. Eight Jud. Dist. Ct., 133 Nev. Adv. Op. 101 (2017), the Nevada Supreme Court provides a concise explanation of the uses of mandamus and administrative mandamus as escape hatches from the final judgment rule. The background of the case...
Nevada, like California, has codified the attorney-client privilege:
A client has a privilege to refuse to disclose, and to prevent any other person from disclosing, confidential communications:
- Between the client or the client’s representative...
Nevada Corporations, NRS 49.095, Nevada Supreme Court, advice of counsel, attorney-client privilege, Attorney-Client Privilege/Work Product, business judgment rule, Limited, NRS 78.138, Okada, waive, Wynn Resorts
ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING CALIFORNIA CORPORATE AND SECURITIES LAW? CONTACT US DIRECTLY
We offer expert advice with the intricacies of California law.
Our years of experience and expertise allow us to help clients navigate the business laws in California.CONTACT US
Get the latest news and analysis about California Corporate & Securities law. Subscribe to our newsletter today!