The California Uniform Trade Secrets Act (CUTSA) provides various remedies for misappropriation of a trade secret (as defined). The legislature, however, was "vexingly oblique" in prescribing the effect of CUTSA on common law claims, such as conversion, based on trade secret misappropriation. Silvaco Data Systems v. Intel Corp., 184 Cal. App. 4th 210, 232 (2010) disapproved of on other grounds, Kwikset Corp. v. Superior Court, 51 Cal. 4th 310 (2011). Nonetheless, the Sixth District Court of Appeal in Silvaco divined a legislative intent to supersede other grounds of civil liability based on "statutory implication, context, legislative history, and general principles of statutory supersession".
Recently, U.S. District Court Judge Cormac J. Carney ruled that CUTSA did not preempt a corporation's claims against a former officer and a competitor for breach of fiduciary duty and aiding and abetting a breach of fiduciary duty when those claims are not premised on the taking or use of confidential information. Chromadex, Inc. v. Elysium Health, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60732. In refusing to dismiss the corporation's breach of fiduciary claims, Judge Carney found that the corporation had premised its claims that were broader and different than taking confidential information.
Copyright © 2019 Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. All Rights Reserved Disclaimer
This publication is made available by Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP for educational purposes only to convey general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you acknowledge there is no attorney-client relationship between you and Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. This publication should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney applied to your circumstances. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.