In a recently released article, Professor Stephen Bainbridge tackles the question of just how real the DExit phenomenon might really be. Among other things, he responds to my argument that Nevada eschews Delaware law precedent by virtue of NRS...
A year ago, Phil Shawe, the Chief Executive Officer of TransPerfect, penned a piece for The Nevada Independent explaining the company's reincorporation from Delaware to Nevada:
Seven years ago, I addressed the question of whether the board of directors of a California corporation could remove a fellow director:
In Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc.,506 A.2d 173, 182 (1986), the Delaware Supreme Court famously held that when the sale of a corporation becomes inevitable, the board of directors' duty changed from the preservation of the...
The line between a direct and derivative action is often indistinct and hence the object of controversy.
In 2019, the Nevada legislature added a provision to the state's corporate law permitting the articles of incorporation or bylaws to require, to the extent not inconsistent with any applicable jurisdictional requirements and the laws of the United...
In a recent post, I took note of another Delaware corporation that had disclosed plans to convert to a Nevada corporation. The Form 8-K filed by this company included the following statement:
NRS 78.585 provides that dissolution does not impair any remedy or cause of action against a dissolved Nevada corporation or its directors, officers, or stockholders if it is commenced within:
A great deal of attention, including in this blog, has been focused Delaware corporations reincorporating in Nevada and other states. See, e.g., Reasons To Quit Delaware Are Gettin' Bigger Each Day and Are Delaware Corporations "Rolling Down Hill,...