Contact us at (949) 353-6347

    Professor Bainbridge Precises Corporate Philanthropy

    Earlier this week, UCLA Law School Professor Stephen Bainbridge precised the question of corporate philanthropy.  He notes "Virtually all states have adopted statutes specifically granting corporations the power to make charitable donations, which...

    Section 207, Corporate Governance, corporate philanthropy, Corporations Code, Stephen Bainbridge

    Delaware Special Litigation Committee Review "Could Stand A Good Tweaking"

    UCLA Law School Professor Stephen Bainbridge recently critiqued the Nevada Supreme Court's decision to follow Auerbach v. Bennett, 419 N.Y.S.2d 920 (1979) rather than Delaware's Zapata Corp. v. Maldonado, 430 A.2d 779 (Del. 1981).  He concludes:

    Nevada Corporations, Derivative Suits, Auerbach v. Bennett, Delaware, derivative action, derivative suit, SLC, Stephen Bainbridge, Zapata

    More On Suing The CEO For Social Activism

    The last few days, I've been writing about the legal issues raised by Jon L. Pritchett and Ed Tiryakian in a recent opinion piece published by The Wall Street Journal.  To sum up the discussion so far, Professor Stephen Bainbridge responded to...

    Corporate Governance, agency, business judgment rule, Civil Code, Labor Code, social activism, Stephen Bainbridge

    Can Shareholders Sue CEOs For Corporate Social Activism?

    In an August 17, 2017 opinion piece published in The Wall Street Journal, Jon L. Pritchett and Ed Tiryakian had the following message for shareholders:

    choice of law, Shlensky v. Wrigley, Corporate Governance, Choice of Law/Conflict of Law, derivative suit, lyman P.Q. Johnson, social activism, Stephen Bainbridge

    Inside And Outside Reverse Veil Piercing

    UCLA Professor Stephen Bainbridge has published several posts commenting on my post discussing Curci Invs. v. Baldwin, 2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 698.  The issue in Curci was whether reverse veil piercing of a limited liability company is possible in...

    Limited Liability Companies, hamartia, reverse veil piercing, Curci, Postal Instant Press, Stephen Bainbridge

    Did The Harvard Shareholder Rights Project Prove Itself Wrong?

    In December 2014, Stanford Law School Professor Joseph A. Grundfest and Daniel M. Gallagher incited an academic titanomachy when they released a draft of an academic paper provocatively entitled "Did Harvard Violate Federal Securities Law?  The...

    Harvard Shareholder Rights Project, practice of law, Rule 14a-8, Corporate Governance, Daniel M. Gallagher, Declassified board, Joseph A. Grundfest, Martijn Cremers, Simone M. Sepe, staggered board, Stephen Bainbridge

    Qualification Of Offers And Sales Of Non-Voting Common Stock Is No Snap In California

    In March, Snap Inc. announced that it and the selling stockholders had sold of 230 million shares of Class A Common Stock to the public at an initial public offering price of $17.00 per share.  The gross proceeds of the offering to the company and...

    California Securities Laws, 10 CCR Section 260.140.1, non voting common stock, NYSE, preemption, Section 25100(o), Bernard Sharfman, Hazel Bradford, Snap Inc., Stephen Bainbridge

    California And Van Gorkom

    As a corporate lawyer, it is hard to ignore the Delaware Supreme Court's opinion in Smith v. Van Gorkom, 488 A.2d 858 (1985) overruled on other grounds Gantler v. Stephens, 965 A.2d 695 (Del. 2009).  Professor Stephen Bainbridge has called it "one...

    Corporate Governance, 102(b)(7), 204(a)(10), Bayless Manning, Bernard Sharfman, Gantler v. Stevens, Katz v. Chevron, Smith v. Van Gorkom, Stephen Bainbridge