Contact us at (949) 353-6347

    Professor Bainbridge Asks "Are shareholder inspection rights subject to the internal affairs doctrine?"

    In this recent post, UCLA Law School Professor Stephen Bainbridge discusses Vice Chancellor  J. Travis Laster's recent ruling that "[s]tockholder inspection rights are a core matter of internal corporate affairs."  2020 Del. Ch. LEXIS 264.  He notes...

    stockholder inspection, Corporate Governance, internal affairs doctrine

    Does This Ruling By V.C. Laster Decide The Constitutionality Of California's Female Board Quota Legislation?

    Michael Corleone's greatest fear was that he would never be able to escape his life as a mafioso ("Just when I thought I was out, they pull me back in!").  California's greatest fear is that it will not be able to dictate corporate governance...

    stockholder inspection, Corporate Governance, internal affairs doctrine

    Internal Affairs Doctrine Blocks Indemnity Claim

    Section 78.7502 of Nevada Revised Statutes broadly authorizes, but does not require, a corporation to indemnify its directors, officers, employees or agents.  NRS 78.751 requires the corporation to indemnify directors, officers, employees or agents...

    Nevada Corporations, Nevada Revised Statutes, internal affairs doctrine

    Was 2018 The Apogee Of Delaware's Corporate Hegemony?

    Professor Mohsen Manesh cites two developments in 2018 as a possible turning point for the internal affairs doctrine: California's enactment of a board gender quota law and Vice Chancellor Laster's ruling in Sciabacucchi v. Salzberg, C.A....

    internal affairs doctrine

    Court Of Appeal Finds No Right To Jury In Shareholder Class Action

    In several blog posts, I have commented on the right to a jury trial under California law.  This may seem like an inapposite subject for a blog devoted to corporate and securities law issues.  Nonetheless, I have prognosticated that the right to...

    legal, McAfee, merger, Securities Litigation, Bylaw, Central Laborers' Pension fund, Delaware law, equitable, forum selection, Intel, internal affairs doctrine, jury trial

    Judge Rules Internal Affairs Doctrine Governs California Insider Trading Statute

    As I have mentioned on numerous occasions, California has its own insider trading statute - California Corporations Code Section 25402.  The statute is included in the California Corporate Securities Law of 1968.  In general, the jurisdiction of...

    California Securities Laws, Friese v. Superior Court, derivative, In re Sagent Technology, Insider Trading, internal affairs doctrine, Jon Tigar, Section 2116, Section 25402, Wells Fargo

    Can Pseudo-Foreign Corporations Exonerate Their Directors?

    Corporations Code Section 2115 is not an easy read.  Fortunately, California Supreme Court Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye has provided a more digestible overview of the statute:

    Greb v. Diamond International, Pseudo foreign corporation, Section 2115, Choice of Law/Conflict of Law, internal affairs doctrine, Section 204(a)(10), section 309

    Officers Of Foreign Corporations And The California Courts

    Yesterday's post concerned Section 2116 of the California Corporations Code.  Courts sometimes describe Section 2116 as codifying the internal affairs doctrine.  See, e.g., Vaughn v. LJ Internat., Inc., 174 Cal. App. 4th 213, 223 (2009) and Voss v....

    oust, Voss v. Sutardja, Uncategorized, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8795, Choice of Law/Conflict of Law, Civil Procedure, internal affairs doctrine, jurisdiction, Section 2116, Section 410.10

    Nevada Legislature Mulls Codification Of The Internal Affairs Doctrine

    Delaware and Nevada are each in the business of marketing their corporate laws to businesses in other states.  Thus, it should surprise no one that these states don't appreciate it when their legal offerings are undermined by other states.  One way...

    Nevada Corporations, SB 203, California Corporations Code, foreign corporation, Hollis v. Hill, internal affairs doctrine, Section 2116, Shaffer v. Heitner, Super Pawn Jewelry & Loan v. Am. Envtl.

    1