Contact us with your California corporate & securities law questions (949) 353-6347 or Contact us here

Fairness Hearings Are Not Just For Merger Transactions

Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act provides an exemption from Securities Act registration for offers and sales of securities in specified exchange transactions.  There are several conditions to the exemption, including the requirement that a court or other authorized governmental entity approve the fairness of the terms and conditions of the exchange.  Because the California Commissioner of Business Oversight has statutory authority to conduct fairness hearings (Cal. Corp. Code § 25142), fairness hearings before the Commissioner have proven to be a cost-effective alternative in California to registration of shares exchanges in connection with merger transactions.  See this post from 2012.

Section 3(a)(10) is not limited to just merger transactions.  Recently, for example, I came across the following disclosure in a Form 8-K:

"A creditor (“Creditor”) of InterCloud Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) purchased the right to collect the balance of an unpaid judgment against the Company by White Winston Select Asset Funds, LLC (“White Winston”) pursuant to a receivable purchase agreement. The amount currently owed to the Creditor is $849,238.39, plus interest, fees, costs and expenses. The Company entered into a Stipulation for Settlement of Claims (the “Settlement”) with the Creditor to settle the judgment claim in exchange for the issuance to Creditor of shares of common stock of the Company ("Common Stock"). The settlement was court approved under 25017(f)(3) of the California Corporations Code and Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended ("Securities Act"). In full and final settlement of the claim, the Company will issue and deliver to the Creditor 39,121,707 shares of Common Stock ("Initial Issuance"), subject to the subsequent adjustments as set forth in the Settlement."

When the Commissioner of Business Oversight holds a fairness hearing, the issuer has applied for a permit.  When a court holds a hearing on the fairness of an issuance or exchange, there is no need to apply for a permit because Section 25017(3) effectively provides that there is no offer or sale.  

Share on:

Corporate Securities Law

ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING CALIFORNIA CORPORATE AND SECURITIES LAW? CONTACT US DIRECTLY

We offer expert advice with the intricacies of California law.

Our years of experience and expertise allow us to help clients navigate the business laws in California.

CONTACT US

Get the latest news and analysis about California Corporate & Securities law. Subscribe to our newsletter today!

We respect your email privacy

ABOUT OUR AUTHOR

30172DBAB0084D3A8F39D7AF0A8E79BC.ashx Keith Paul Bishop
Partner at Allen Matkins
(949) 353-6328
 Contact me
Learn More About Keith

RECOGNITION

JDSupra 2018

nominee-badge

Get the latest news and analysis about California Corporate & Securities law. Subscribe to our newsletter today!

We respect your email privacy

CATEGORIES

see all

YOUTUBE

FACEBOOK