Contact us with your California corporate & securities law questions (949) 353-6347 or Contact us here

Want To Reduce The Costs Of Controlling Cheating By Corporate Agents? Paper Suggests Incorporating In Nevada

Last month, I mentioned a recent article by Professor Michal Barzuza which described Nevada as applying "a strikingly lax corporate law to its corporations".  Michal Barzuza, Market Segmentation: The Rise of Nevada as a Liability-Free Jurisdiction, 98 Va. Law Rev. 935 (2012).  Now, Professor Bruce Kobayashi and the late Professor Larry Ribstein have published an article that suggests that while Nevada's law may be lax, it is not "suboptimally lax".  They suggest that firm managers aren't choosing Nevada so that they can take advantage of these lax standards to cheat.  Rather, they speculate that firms may incorporate in Nevada so that they can reduce their costs of controlling cheating.  In other words, the rational decision might be to trade the higher cost of an increased risk of cheating for the lower costs of controlling cheating.

If you happen to be interested in the corporate law of Nevada, I can think of no better resource than my book, Bishop & Zucker on Nevada Corporations and Limited Liability Companies

Share on:

ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING CALIFORNIA CORPORATE AND SECURITIES LAW? CONTACT US DIRECTLY

We offer expert advice with the intricacies of California law.

Our years of experience and expertise allow us to help clients navigate the business laws in California.

CONTACT US

Get the latest news and analysis about California Corporate & Securities law. Subscribe to our newsletter today!

We respect your email privacy

ABOUT OUR AUTHOR

30172DBAB0084D3A8F39D7AF0A8E79BC.ashx Keith Paul Bishop
Partner at Allen Matkins
(949) 353-6328
 Contact me
Learn More About Keith

nominee-badge

Get the latest news and analysis about California Corporate & Securities law. Subscribe to our newsletter today!

We respect your email privacy

CATEGORIES

see all

RECOGNITION

YOUTUBE

FACEBOOK