Contact us with your California corporate & securities law questions (949) 353-6347 or Contact us here

Nevada Supreme Court Doubles Down On Joint Venture By Estoppel

Last March, I wrote about a decision of a panel of the Nevada Supreme Court in In re Cay Clubs, 130 Nev. Adv. 14 (2014).  The defendants thereafter sought reconsideration by the Supreme Court sitting en banc.  Yesterday, the Supreme Court issued its opinion.  For those familiar with the panel's opinion, there are no surprises from the full court.  The full Court found:

  • Partnership by estoppel can be found whether the subject of the action is a partnership or a joint venture;
  • The consent required for partnership by estoppel can be express or implied from conduct;
  • The reference to "given credit" in NRS 87.160(1) means "giving credence to the representation by detrimentally relying on it to engage in a transaction with the purported partnership;
  • The claimant must have reasonably relied on the representation of partnership or joint venture; and
  • Partnership liability may be imposed with respect to non-contractual claims that implicate the reliance element.

130 Nev. Adv. 92 (2014).

 

Share on:

ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING CALIFORNIA CORPORATE AND SECURITIES LAW? CONTACT US DIRECTLY

We offer expert advice with the intricacies of California law.

Our years of experience and expertise allow us to help clients navigate the business laws in California.

CONTACT US

Get the latest news and analysis about California Corporate & Securities law. Subscribe to our newsletter today!

We respect your email privacy

ABOUT OUR AUTHOR

30172DBAB0084D3A8F39D7AF0A8E79BC.ashx Keith Paul Bishop
Partner at Allen Matkins
(949) 353-6328
 Contact me
Learn More About Keith

nominee-badge

Get the latest news and analysis about California Corporate & Securities law. Subscribe to our newsletter today!

We respect your email privacy

CATEGORIES

see all

RECOGNITION

YOUTUBE

FACEBOOK