Contact us with your California corporate & securities law questions (949) 353-6347 or Contact us here

Why Some Delaware Corporations May Be Concerned With California's Supermajority Vote Requirements

Section 710(b) of the California Corporations Code defines a "supermajority vote" as a requirement set forth in a corporation's articles of incorporation (or certificate of determination) that specified actions be approved by a larger proportion of the outstanding shares than a majority, or by a larger proportion of the outstanding shares of a class or series than a majority.  Most readers won't find this definition either novel or alarming.  Some readers, however, may be nonplussed to learn that a supermajority vote requirement subject to Section 710 may not exceed 66 2/3 percent of the outstanding shares or 66 2/3 percent of the outstanding shares of any class or series of those shares.  These readers may even be unnerved to learn that Section 710 may be applicable to foreign corporations meeting the conditions set forth in Corporations Code Section 2115.

A statute so confused, so strange, so outrageous, and so variable

Explaining the application of Section 710 is no easy task for this writer.  First, the statute does not apply to corporations with just a few shareholders, i.e, those with outstanding shares held by fewer than 100 persons (as determined in Section 305 of the Corporations Code).  Expressed more positively, Section 710 applies to corporations with shares held of record by 100 or more persons.  Second, the statute applies only to a corporation that files an amendment to its articles or certificate of incorporation containing a supermajority vote provision on or after January 1, 1989.

But wait, there's more.  A special rule applies to corporations that file an amendment on or after January 1, 1994.  Section 710 does not apply to a corporation if at the time of filing, the corporation has (i) outstanding shares of more than one class or series of stock, (ii) no class of equity securities registered under Section 12(b) or 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (3) outstanding shares held of record by fewer than 300 persons (as determined by Section 605).  What could the legislature have possibly been thinking in creating this bizarre exception?  This exception was the result of a legislative compromise intended to facilitate venture capital financings.  The result of conditions is to impose the statute's limitations on supermajority vote provisions on privately held corporations with large numbers of stockholders of record.  Formerly, only a small number of corporations may have met the parameters of Section 710.  Now, the number of companies subject to Section 710 may be much larger as a result of  the increased thresholds for registration and termination under the Exchange Act established by the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act  and Title LXXXV of the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act.

Share on:

Supermajority vote, Corporate Governance, 66 2/3 vote, California Sui Generis, Section 710, venture capital

ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING CALIFORNIA CORPORATE AND SECURITIES LAW? CONTACT US DIRECTLY

We offer expert advice with the intricacies of California law.

Our years of experience and expertise allow us to help clients navigate the business laws in California.

CONTACT US

Get the latest news and analysis about California Corporate & Securities law. Subscribe to our newsletter today!

We respect your email privacy

ABOUT OUR AUTHOR

30172DBAB0084D3A8F39D7AF0A8E79BC.ashx Keith Paul Bishop
Partner at Allen Matkins
(949) 353-6328
 Contact me
Learn More About Keith

RECOGNITION

NationalLawReview

badge-author-large

nominee-badge

Get the latest news and analysis about California Corporate & Securities law. Subscribe to our newsletter today!

We respect your email privacy

CATEGORIES

see all

YOUTUBE

FACEBOOK