Contact us with your California corporate & securities law questions (949) 353-6347 or Contact us here

There's No Dressing This Up - Item 303(a)(1) Of Regulation S-K Is Unreasonable

In less than a month, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Leidos, Inc. v. Indiana Public Retirement System (Docket No. 16-581).  The question presented in Leidos is:

Whether the Second Circuit erred in holding - in direct conflict with the decisions of the Third and Ninth Circuits - that Item 303 of SEC Regulation S-K creates a duty to disclose that is actionable under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5.

Item 303 specifies what a registrant must include in its Management's Discussion and Analysis.  Whether one agrees with the Second Circuit or not, it should be beyond peradventure that the disclosure standard established by Item 303(a)(1) is nonsensical.  Item 303(a)(1) requires a registrant to:

 Identify any known trends or any known demands, commitments, events or uncertainties that will result in or that are reasonably likely to result in the registrant's liquidity increasing or decreasing in any material way.

But what does it mean to say that something is "reasonably likely"?  The likelihood of anything is a determination of its probability.  The probability that a fair coin will land heads or tails is .50.  This .50 probability is neither reasonable nor unreasonable - it just is.  It is simply nonsense to call a .50 probability of the coin landing heads reasonably likely.

Suppose a registrant determines with absolute accuracy (I don't know how) that there is a .15 probability that a certain event will decrease liquidity in a material amount.  If you believe that this makes the "reasonably likely", what makes it so?

Share on:

Regulation S-K, reasonably likely, Securities Litigation, Item 303, leidos v. Indiana Public Retirement

ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING CALIFORNIA CORPORATE AND SECURITIES LAW? CONTACT US DIRECTLY

We offer expert advice with the intricacies of California law.

Our years of experience and expertise allow us to help clients navigate the business laws in California.

CONTACT US

Get the latest news and analysis about California Corporate & Securities law. Subscribe to our newsletter today!

We respect your email privacy

ABOUT OUR AUTHOR

30172DBAB0084D3A8F39D7AF0A8E79BC.ashx Keith Paul Bishop
Partner at Allen Matkins
(949) 353-6328
 Contact me
Learn More About Keith

nominee-badge

Get the latest news and analysis about California Corporate & Securities law. Subscribe to our newsletter today!

We respect your email privacy

CATEGORIES

see all

RECOGNITION

YOUTUBE

FACEBOOK