Contact us with your California corporate & securities law questions (949) 353-6347 or Contact us here

Nevada Supreme Court Won't Allow Advisory Mandamus Escape Hatch

In Archon v. Eight Jud. Dist. Ct., 133 Nev. Adv. Op. 101 (2017), the Nevada Supreme Court provides a concise explanation of the uses of mandamus and administrative mandamus as escape hatches from the final judgment rule.  The background of the case is a bit weird, but it involved a suit by the preferred stockholders of a corporation alleging that the corporation had incorrectly calculated the redemption price.  After the plaintiffs won on summary judgment, the corporation successfully moved to dismiss the suit for want of subject matter jurisdiction (the amount in controversy was slightly less than the $5 million required by 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)).  At that point, the plaintiff in the Nevada action filed his own complaint and the defendants moved to dismiss based on the running of the statute of limitations.  The trial court denied the motion based on "cross jurisdictional tolling" and other grounds.  The defendants then sought review through by seeking advisory mandamus from the Nevada Supreme Court.

The Nevada Supreme Court refused to grant extraordinary writ relief, explaining:

Mandamus is an important escape hatch from the final judgment rule, but such relief must be issued sparingly and thoughtfully due to its disruptive nature.  Advisory mandamus, like any form of interlocutory review, carries the significant negative risks of delaying the ultimate resolution of the dispute and undermining the "mutual respect that generally and necessarily marks the relationship between . . . trial and appellate courts".   Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650, 653 (9th Cir. 1977).

This is not the end of the road for the defendants.  As the Supreme Court pointed out, they will have further opportunities to present their arguments at summary judgment, or to the Supreme Court on appeal or, even, in another writ petition depending upon discovery and the eventual substantive motion practice that may ensue.

Giving a hand to mandamus

For the etymology of "mandamus" and California's two forms of mandamus, see this post from August, 2016.

 

Share on:

appeal, extraordinary writ, Nevada Corporations, Advisory mandamus, Nevada Supreme Court

ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING CALIFORNIA CORPORATE AND SECURITIES LAW? CONTACT US DIRECTLY

We offer expert advice with the intricacies of California law.

Our years of experience and expertise allow us to help clients navigate the business laws in California.

CONTACT US

Get the latest news and analysis about California Corporate & Securities law. Subscribe to our newsletter today!

We respect your email privacy

ABOUT OUR AUTHOR

30172DBAB0084D3A8F39D7AF0A8E79BC.ashx Keith Paul Bishop
Partner at Allen Matkins
(949) 353-6328
 Contact me
Learn More About Keith

nominee-badge

Get the latest news and analysis about California Corporate & Securities law. Subscribe to our newsletter today!

We respect your email privacy

CATEGORIES

see all

RECOGNITION

YOUTUBE

FACEBOOK