Contact us with your California corporate & securities law questions (949) 353-6347 or Contact us here

Court Applies Corporate Alter Ego Law To Nevada LLC

Corporations and limited liability companies share a key feature - insulation of owners from the liabilities of the entity.  In the 19th century, courts began to fashion a significant exception to this principle for corporations.  The exception became known as the "alter ego doctrine".  The exception was not applied to LLCs because they did not then exist.  With the advent of LLCs, courts have had to confront the question of whether the alter ego doctrine applies to LLCs.

The Nevada Supreme Court has yet to address the issue.  However, U.S. District Court Judge Kent J. Dawson recently predicted that the Nevada Supreme Court "would treat an LLC as a corporation for the purposes of applying the 'alter ego' doctrine and piercing the corporate veil." Bustos v. Dennis, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45764. 

But why predict?  The Nevada legislature has seemingly already answered the question.  NRS 86.371 provides:

Unless otherwise provided in the articles of organization or an agreement signed by the member or manager to be charged, no member or manager of any limited-liability company formed under the laws of this State is individually liable for the debts or liabilities of the company.

Judge Dawson's ruling notes NRS 86.371 but apparently views the alter ego doctrine as an unexpressed exception to the statute.  NRS 78.747 governing corporations similarly immunizes stockholders from corporate liabilities " unless the stockholder . . . acts as the alter ego of the corporation".  Judge Dawson does not explain why the express exception in NRS 78.747 should be read into NRS 86.371.  

Update:  Judge Dawson's prediction was correct but he was incorrect in asserting that "the issue [of the applicability of the alter ego doctrine to LLCs] has not been decided by the Nevada Supreme Court".  In fact, the Nevada Supreme Court held last November that "the alter ego doctrine applies to LLCs".  Gardner v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of State, 405 P.3d 651, 656 (Nev. 2017).  I discuss the Nevada Supreme Court's earlier holding in Gardner in Nevada Supreme Court Holds That Member-Managers Were Not Proper Parties To Negligence Claim Against An LLC.

Share on:

ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING CALIFORNIA CORPORATE AND SECURITIES LAW? CONTACT US DIRECTLY

We offer expert advice with the intricacies of California law.

Our years of experience and expertise allow us to help clients navigate the business laws in California.

CONTACT US

Get the latest news and analysis about California Corporate & Securities law. Subscribe to our newsletter today!

We respect your email privacy

ABOUT OUR AUTHOR

30172DBAB0084D3A8F39D7AF0A8E79BC.ashx Keith Paul Bishop
Partner at Allen Matkins
(949) 353-6328
 Contact me
Learn More About Keith

RECOGNITION

JDSupra 2018

nominee-badge

Get the latest news and analysis about California Corporate & Securities law. Subscribe to our newsletter today!

We respect your email privacy

CATEGORIES

see all

YOUTUBE

FACEBOOK