Contact us with your California corporate & securities law questions (949) 353-6347 or Contact us here

Court Rules Lot Sales Were Sales Of Securities

After a five week trial, a San Diego jury convicted Ronald Duane Dunham of multiple crimes, including seven counts of securities fraud.  He was sentenced to 12 years in prison.  After unsuccessfully appealing his conviction to the California Court of Appeal (People v. Dunham People v. Dunham, 2018 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 874), Dunham filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in federal court.  Among other things, Dunham argued that his sale of lots in a real estate development were not securities under the California Corporate Securities Law of 1968.

Last week, U.S. District Court Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel denied Dunham's petition.   Citing SEC v. Schooler, 905 F.3d 1107 (9th Circ. 2018), Judge Curiel reasoned that a reasonable jury could have concluded that lots sold by Dunham were not independent real estate transactions but the sale of securities:

"Dunham argues there was insufficient evidence for the jury to conclude the Cherokee Village lot purchases were securities because the expected profits from the investment were not 'derived from the managerial efforts of others.' . . .  He contends they were simply purchases of individual lots by individual investors.  As discussed in section IV(C)(4)(b)(i) above, all of the victims testified they were told they were purchasing lots or interests in GCREF in order to be part of and profit from a future retirement development, that Dunham would oversee the development, and that Dunham had the experience to make the development a success and that the lots would increase in value over time as the project took shape.  . . .  None of the victims, with the possible exception of Jay and Marilyne A. who testified they considered using one of the lots they owned for a retirement home, planned to develop their lots themselves.  . . .  The evidence also established Dunham himself thought of the lot purchases as 'common enterprise' that he was managing.  After the victims purchased the lots, Dunham held events at which plans for the development and a marketing campaign were described.  . . .

(Citations to the record omitted). 

 

Share on:

Corporate Securities Law

ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING CALIFORNIA CORPORATE AND SECURITIES LAW? CONTACT US DIRECTLY

We offer expert advice with the intricacies of California law.

Our years of experience and expertise allow us to help clients navigate the business laws in California.

CONTACT US

Get the latest news and analysis about California Corporate & Securities law. Subscribe to our newsletter today!

We respect your email privacy

ABOUT OUR AUTHOR

30172DBAB0084D3A8F39D7AF0A8E79BC.ashx Keith Paul Bishop
Partner at Allen Matkins
(949) 353-6328
 Contact me
Learn More About Keith

RECOGNITION

NationalLawReview

badge-author-large

nominee-badge

Get the latest news and analysis about California Corporate & Securities law. Subscribe to our newsletter today!

We respect your email privacy

CATEGORIES

see all

YOUTUBE

FACEBOOK