Contact us with your California corporate & securities law questions (949) 353-6347 or Contact us here

Dubiety Clouds Gubernatorial Order Allowing Virtual-Only Shareholder Meetings

On Monday, Governor Newsom issued an executive order pursuant to California's Emergency Services Act, Government Code Sections 8567 & 8571.  The order is intended to provide tax, regulatory and licensing extensions for businesses.  The order also purports to suspend temporarily the apparent need for California corporations to obtain universal shareholder consent to hold a virtual-only shareholder meeting pursuant Corporations Code Section 600(e) (last sentence):

"For any shareholder meetings that already have been scheduled, or must occur before June 30, 2020, the requirements in Corporations Code sections 20 and 600 to request and receive the consent of shareholders for meetings of shareholders to be held by electronic transmission or by electronic video screen communication are hereby suspended, and the requirement in Corporations Code section 601 to provide written notice of such meetings is hereby suspended, to the extent that a corporation has provided notice to its shareholders that a meeting will occur at a physical location and subsequently provides notice by a press release, website posting and other means reasonably designed to inform shareholders that the meeting will occur by electronic transmission or by electronic video screen communication."

The fly in the ointment (see Ecclesiastes 10:1) is that the Governor may not have the statutory authority to suspend these requirements.  As I pointed out in this post, the Emergency Services Act gives the Governor the authority to suspend only two types of statutes: "regulatory statutes" or "statutes prescribing the procedure for the conduct of state business".   "Regulatory statute" is not defined and no one can say with certitude that the statutes purportedly suspended by the Governor are regulatory statutes.  Corporations that proceed with virtual only meetings based on the Governor's order will therefore necessarily be assuming the risk that actions taken at these meetings may be later invalidated.  Lawyers may want to take this into account if asked to provide a "due authorization" opinion based on shareholder action taken at such a meeting.

Virtual Delaware/California Corporate Law Update

This Thursday, Michael Allen, a director at the Delaware law firm of Richards, Layton & Finger and I will again be providing an update on Delaware and California corporate law.  Registration information is available here.

Share on:

Corporate Governance

ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING CALIFORNIA CORPORATE AND SECURITIES LAW? CONTACT US DIRECTLY

We offer expert advice with the intricacies of California law.

Our years of experience and expertise allow us to help clients navigate the business laws in California.

CONTACT US

ABOUT OUR AUTHOR

30172DBAB0084D3A8F39D7AF0A8E79BC.ashx Keith Paul Bishop
Partner at Allen Matkins
(949) 353-6328
 Contact me
Learn More About Keith

RECOGNITION
JD Supra Readers Choice Top Author 2020

NationalLawReview



nominee-badge

Get the latest news and analysis about California Corporate & Securities law. Subscribe to our newsletter today!

We respect your email privacy

CATEGORIES

see all

YOUTUBE

FACEBOOK