Contact us with your California corporate & securities law questions (949) 353-6347 or Contact us here

Internal Affairs Doctrine Blocks Indemnity Claim

Section 78.7502 of Nevada Revised Statutes broadly authorizes, but does not require, a corporation to indemnify its directors, officers, employees or agents.  NRS 78.751 requires the corporation to indemnify directors, officers, employees or agents that successfully defend an indemnifiable. 

When Kazuo Okada sued a Japanese corporation for indemnification for expenses and attorneys' fees incurred in litigation that was voluntarily dismissed, the defendants argued that the internal affairs doctrine necessarily means that NRS 78.502 does not apply.  In a recent ruling U.S. District Court Judge Richard F. Boulware, II agreed and dismissed the claims.  Judge Boulware, however, did not dismiss the claims against a Nevada corporation from which Mr. Okada also seeks indemnification.  Universal Entertainment Corporation v. Aruze Gaming America, Inc., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96681.  

Readers of the decision should note that it quotes the earlier version of NRS 78.7502.  The Nevada legislature substantially amended the statute last year.  2019 Nev. Stats. ch. 19, §§ 15 & 16.

Share on:

Nevada Corporations, Nevada Revised Statutes, internal affairs doctrine

ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING CALIFORNIA CORPORATE AND SECURITIES LAW? CONTACT US DIRECTLY

We offer expert advice with the intricacies of California law.

Our years of experience and expertise allow us to help clients navigate the business laws in California.

CONTACT US

ABOUT OUR AUTHOR

30172DBAB0084D3A8F39D7AF0A8E79BC.ashx Keith Paul Bishop
Partner at Allen Matkins
(949) 353-6328
 Contact me
Learn More About Keith

RECOGNITION
JD Supra Readers Choice Top Author 2020

NationalLawReview



nominee-badge

Get the latest news and analysis about California Corporate & Securities law. Subscribe to our newsletter today!

We respect your email privacy

CATEGORIES

see all

YOUTUBE

FACEBOOK