Contact us with your California corporate & securities law questions (949) 353-6347 or Contact us here

More Quorum Mysteries

Six years ago, I kvetched "Why Does Determining A Quorum Have To Be So Complicated?"  That particular post concerned the fine points of determining quorums for board meetings. The determination of a quorum for a meeting of shareholders can be equally exasperating.

California Corporations Code Section 602(a) establishes both a default rule and minimum quorum requirement:

"Unless otherwise provided in the articles, a majority of the shares entitled to vote, represented in person or by proxy, shall constitute a quorum at a meeting of the shareholders, but in no event shall a quorum consist of less than one-third (or, in the case of a mutual water company, 20 percent) of the shares entitled to vote at the meeting or, except in the case of a close corporation, of more than a majority of the shares entitled to vote at the meeting."

 Section 112 adds to this by providing

"Whenever in this division shares are disqualified from voting on any matter, they shall not be considered outstanding for the determination of a quorum at any meeting to act upon, or the required vote to approve action upon, that matter under any other provision of this division or the articles or bylaws."

Section 310(a)(1), which provides how shareholders may approve a transaction between the corporation and an interested director, is one example in which the General Corporation Law disqualifies shares from voting.  Thus, if a meeting of shareholders is held to approve an interested director transaction and the interested director owns 90% of the outstanding shares, only a majority of the 10% would need to be represented at the meeting to constitute a quorum (assuming that the articles did not impose a different quorum requirement).  What if that was not the only matter to be considered at the meeting and the interested director's shares are not represented at the meeting?  Ordinarily, the absence of the interested director's shares would preclude a quorum.  It would seem quirky that one agenda item could reduce the quorum requirement to 5% of the outstanding shares + 1 share.  

Why not quora?

"Quorum" is a Latin, plural, masculine pronoun in the genitive case.  It can be translated as "of whose".  Because "quorum" ends in "um", it is sometimes mistaken as a second declension, neuter noun, such as "dictum" and "erratum".  The plural in the nominative and accusative cases of these second declension, neuter nouns is formed by substituting "a" for "um", as in "dicta" and "errata".  

Share on:

California Corporations Code, Corporate Governance


We offer expert advice with the intricacies of California law.

Our years of experience and expertise allow us to help clients navigate the business laws in California.



30172DBAB0084D3A8F39D7AF0A8E79BC.ashx Keith Paul Bishop
Partner at Allen Matkins
(949) 353-6328
 Contact me
Learn More About Keith

JD Supra Readers Choice Top Author 2020



Get the latest news and analysis about California Corporate & Securities law. Subscribe to our newsletter today!

We respect your email privacy


see all