Contact us with your California corporate & securities law questions (949) 353-6347 or Contact us here

SEC Proposes To Rewrite The FOIA

For more than a half century, the Freedom of Information Act (aka FOIA) grants any person a legally enforcable right to obtain access to federal agency records (with certain exceptions). The FOIA requires federal agencies to promulgate regulations, "specifying the schedule of fees applicable to the processing of requests"  and "establishing procedures and guidelines for determining when such fees should be waived or reduced". 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(A)(i).  

Just before Christmas last, the Securities and Exchange Commission proposed amendments to its FOIA rules to "(1) reflect changes required by the FOIA . . . and (2) clarify, update, and streamline the language of several procedural provisions".  Among other things, the SEC is proposing to add and clarify certain fee related definitions.  These changes may seem mundane, but the SEC's proposed definitions would add limitations not found in the FOIA itself.

The FOIA requires the SEC to adopt regulations limiting fees to "reasonable standard charges for document duplication when records are not sought for commercial use and the request is made by an educational or noncommercial scientific institution, whose purpose is scholarly or scientific research".  The SEC has proposed to define "educational institution" as follows:

"'Educational institution' is any school that operates a program of scholarly research. A requester in this fee category must show that the request is authorized by, and is made under the auspices of, an educational institution and that the records are not sought for a commercial use, but rather are sought to further scholarly research."

While the SEC's proposed definition appears prima facie to be consonant with the statute, it in fact subtly shifts the statutory requirements.  The FOIA requires that the institution have a purpose of scholarly or scientific research.  In contrast, the SEC's proposal requires that the requester show that the records are to further scholarly research.  Given the statutory requirement that records not be sought for commercial use, this may not seem a consequential difference, it makes two potentially important changes to the statutory requirement.  First, the statute merely requires the disclaimer of a commercial purpose, the SEC's rule requires a showing of scholarly purpose.  Second, the SEC's requirement narrows the noncommercial purposes to only "scholarly research".  While this may seem little more than a cavil, the SEC should not be allowed to erode the FOIA by subtly shifting statutory requirements. 

 

Share on:

Public Records Act/FOIA

ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING CALIFORNIA CORPORATE AND SECURITIES LAW? CONTACT US DIRECTLY

We offer expert advice with the intricacies of California law.

Our years of experience and expertise allow us to help clients navigate the business laws in California.

CONTACT US

Get the latest news and analysis about California Corporate & Securities law. Subscribe to our newsletter today!

We respect your email privacy

ABOUT OUR AUTHOR

30172DBAB0084D3A8F39D7AF0A8E79BC.ashx Keith Paul Bishop
Partner at Allen Matkins
(949) 353-6328
 Contact me
Learn More About Keith

nominee-badge

Get the latest news and analysis about California Corporate & Securities law. Subscribe to our newsletter today!

We respect your email privacy

CATEGORIES

see all

RECOGNITION

YOUTUBE

FACEBOOK