Contact us with your California corporate & securities law questions (949) 353-6347 or Contact us here

Where Is A Holding Company's Principal Place Of Business?

Businesses often prefer to have their cases tried in federal court, but the U.S. District Courts are courts of limited jurisdiction.  When there is no federal question at issue, the Court's jurisdiction may depend on whether there is diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332.  That statute establishes original jurisdiction for civil actions when the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000, exclusive of interest and costs, and the action involves "diverse" parties.  One type of diversity that will establish jurisdiction under the statute exists when the parties are "citizens of different states".  The statute provides that "a corporation shall be deemed to be a citizen of every State . . . by which it has been incorporated and of the State . . . where it has its principal place of business." 28 U.S.C. §1332(c)(1).  

But where is a corporation's principal place of business when the corporation is a holding company with few, if any, activities?  The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals answered that question earlier this week in 3123 SMB LLC v. Horn, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 1121.  The short answer is:

[A] recently- formed holding company's principal place of business is the place where it has its board meetings, regardless of whether such meetings have already occurred, unless evidence shows that the corporation is directed from elsewhere.

In reaching this conclusion, the Court of Appeals rejected the notion that a holding company's principal place of business is in the state where its officers reside.  The Ninth Circuit said that such a rule ignores the Supreme Court's holding that a corporation's principal place of business "is a place within a State" and not the state itself.  Hertz Corp. v. Friend, 559 U.S. 77, 93 (2010).  The Ninth Circuit also found such a rule to be unworkable because corporate decision-makers may live in more than one state ("How is a district court to choose among them?").

The lesson of this case is the question of where board meetings are held may be more than a question of the directors' convenience, it may determine whether the corporation can be sued in federal court.

Share on:

foreign corporation

ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING CALIFORNIA CORPORATE AND SECURITIES LAW? CONTACT US DIRECTLY

We offer expert advice with the intricacies of California law.

Our years of experience and expertise allow us to help clients navigate the business laws in California.

CONTACT US

Get the latest news and analysis about California Corporate & Securities law. Subscribe to our newsletter today!

We respect your email privacy

ABOUT OUR AUTHOR

30172DBAB0084D3A8F39D7AF0A8E79BC.ashx Keith Paul Bishop
Partner at Allen Matkins
(949) 353-6328
 Contact me
Learn More About Keith

nominee-badge

Get the latest news and analysis about California Corporate & Securities law. Subscribe to our newsletter today!

We respect your email privacy

CATEGORIES

see all

RECOGNITION

YOUTUBE

FACEBOOK