Contact us with your California corporate & securities law questions (949) 353-6347 or Contact us here

Applying The Statute Of Frauds To "Et Al."

Charles II, aka the "Merry Monarch", was sitting on the English throne when the original Statute of Frauds was enacted in 1677.  Therefore, one should be forgiven for the mistaken presumption that all questions involving the application of the statute have been raised and duly answered.  Just yesterday, in fact, the California Court of Appeal addressed the apparently novel question of whether the Statute of Frauds bars enforcement of a real estate brokerage agreement signed by the broker and one of several owners of the property.  Jacobs v. Locatelli, Cal. Ct. of Appeal Case No. H042292 (Feb. 8, 2017).

The agreement at issue in the case defined "owner" as "John B. Locatelli, Trustee of the John B. Locatelli Trust, et al."  Only Mr. Locatelli signed the agreement even though there were signature lines for five other owners.  The owners argued that the broker's complaint was barred by the Statute of Frauds.  The trial court judge, Paul M. Marigonda, agreed.  The Court of Appeal did not.  Writing for the Court, Presiding Justice Conrad L. Rushing found that the "real issue" was the sufficiency of the broker's allegation that Mr. Locatelli signed on behalf of the other owners, who formed a joint venture.  Justice Rushing found that Judge Marigonda should have allowed the case to proceed so that the broker could introduce extrinsic evidence as to how Mr. Locatelli signed the agreement.

What about the others?

Justice Rushing noted that "'et al.' clearly means, in this context, 'and others.'".  The phrase is an abbreviation of the Latin et alii, aliae or alia, which means "and others".  The three different endings are based on the grammatical masculine, feminine and neuter plural forms of the word alius.  Clearly, the advantage of using the abbreviation is not having to make a grammatical gender choice.

Share on:

Partnerships, real estate broker, statute of frauds, et al., Jacobs v. Locatelli, Judge Paul M. Marigonda, Justice Conrad L. Rushing, writing

ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING CALIFORNIA CORPORATE AND SECURITIES LAW? CONTACT US DIRECTLY

We offer expert advice with the intricacies of California law.

Our years of experience and expertise allow us to help clients navigate the business laws in California.

CONTACT US

Get the latest news and analysis about California Corporate & Securities law. Subscribe to our newsletter today!

We respect your email privacy

ABOUT OUR AUTHOR

30172DBAB0084D3A8F39D7AF0A8E79BC.ashx Keith Paul Bishop
Partner at Allen Matkins
(949) 353-6328
 Contact me
Learn More About Keith

nominee-badge

Get the latest news and analysis about California Corporate & Securities law. Subscribe to our newsletter today!

We respect your email privacy

CATEGORIES

see all

RECOGNITION

YOUTUBE

FACEBOOK