Keith Paul Bishop

Keith Paul Bishop

Keith Bishop works with privately-held and publicly-traded companies on federal and state corporate and securities transactions, compliance, and governance matters. He is highly-regarded for his in-depth knowledge of the distinctive corporate and regulatory requirements faced by corporations in the state of California. While many law firms have a great deal of expertise in federal or Delaware corporate law, Keith’s specific focus on California corporate and securities law is uncommon. A former California state regulator of securities and financial institutions, Keith has decades of experience navigating the regulatory-intensive state’s rules. For companies with substantial operations in California but incorporated elsewhere, Keith is an exceptional resource. He is frequently called in to help with issues arising under California’s “blue sky” and lender laws. An avid writer, Keith’s blog, www.calcorporatelaw.com, covers a diverse collection of California corporate and securities law issues and has served as a valued resource for other attorneys, business executives, judges, and media, nationwide.

Recent Posts

Does The SEC Grant Only Industry Requests?

Yesterday, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted final rules for the disclosure of payments by "resource extraction issuers".  These rules implement Section 13(q) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Section 13(q) was added by the...

DFPI Posts Florilegium Of New Legislation

"Gather ye Rose-buds while ye may"

Is Nasdaq's Proposed Listing Standard Legal In California?

The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC made headlines earlier this month by proposing amendments to its listing rules with a goal of promoting board of directors diversity. If approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission, Nasdaq will, among other things,...

California Is Driving Out Its Crown Jewels

Last Friday, Oracle Corporation disclosed in a Form 10-Q that it was moving its principal executive offices to Austin, Texas.  The disclosure appeared under "Item 5 - Other Information":

Nevada Finds Disgorgement Is No Penalty

In 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court held that disgorgement in an SEC enforcement action is subject to the five-year limitations period in 28 U.S.C. § 2462 that applies to an "action, suit or proceeding for the enforcement of a civil fine, penalty or...

Fee Shifting May Be New To Delaware, But It's Old Hat In California

Writing for DealLawyers.com, John Jenkins yesterday took note of the Delaware Court of Chancery's decision in Pettry v. Gilead Sciences, (Del. Ch.; 11/20).  Quoting this Cleary Gottlieb blog, John observes that Pettry "introduces a new element of...

Court Finds No Substantial Federal Issue Engendered By Claim Of California Option Plan Exemption

The United States federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction.  Therefore, it is not always possible to make a "federal case" out of claim, even when issues of federal law may be involved. 

Court Cogitates On Meaning Of "Stock"

Under California's famous Proposition 13, a change in ownership of real property triggers a reappraisal and reassessment of the property for property tax purposes.  Section 60 of the Revenue & Taxation Code defines a "change in ownership" as "a...

The German Empress And "She"

Anyone drafting a legal document will at some time or another have to deal with the problem that English personal pronouns refer to the perceived biological gender of its referent. Historically, attorneys tended to use male personal pronouns...