Keith Paul Bishop

Keith Paul Bishop

Keith Bishop works with privately-held and publicly-traded companies on federal and state corporate and securities transactions, compliance, and governance matters. He is highly-regarded for his in-depth knowledge of the distinctive corporate and regulatory requirements faced by corporations in the state of California. While many law firms have a great deal of expertise in federal or Delaware corporate law, Keith’s specific focus on California corporate and securities law is uncommon. A former California state regulator of securities and financial institutions, Keith has decades of experience navigating the regulatory-intensive state’s rules. For companies with substantial operations in California but incorporated elsewhere, Keith is an exceptional resource. He is frequently called in to help with issues arising under California’s “blue sky” and lender laws. An avid writer, Keith’s blog, www.calcorporatelaw.com, covers a diverse collection of California corporate and securities law issues and has served as a valued resource for other attorneys, business executives, judges, and media, nationwide.

Recent Posts

In This Case Decanting Was In Error

I am no oenophile but I have heard of decanting a bottle of wine.  I am also not a trust and estates lawyer but I have never heard of decanting a trust's assets - until yesterday when I read the Nevada Supreme Court's opinion in In the Matter of The...

I-Bank Bill Advances Despite Manifold Issues

A California bill that would charter the California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank (I-Bank) as a depository institution passed out of the Senate Banking and Financial Institutions Committee yesterday. If the I-Bank becomes a depository...

Implied Causes Of Action Under The California Corporate Securities Law

As has been widely reported, the United States Supreme Court has dismissed as improvidently granted the writ of certiorari in Emulex Corporation v. Varjabedian.  This action leaves standing, at least for the time being, the Ninth Circuit Court of...

Leaving California By Short-Form Merger Without Shareholder Approval Fugetaboutit!

California, like Delaware and other states, authorizes a short-form merger procedure. Essentially, this involves a merger of a subsidiary into its parent or vice versa. Under California's statute, the parent corporation must own all of the...

Fee Shifting Bill Dies While Nevada Legislature Continues To Mull Other Corporate Law Amendments

Last month, I noted the introduction of a bill, SB 304, in the Nevada legislature that would authorize fee shifting. The bill, however, enjoyed only a brief moment in the legislative sun. It never passed out of committee and recently died pursuant...

The "Other" EDGAR

Did you know that some companies with securities registered under Section 12(b) or 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 do not file their periodic reports and proxy materials on EDGAR? Section 12(i) of the Exchange Act vests the Federal...

Court Rules Internal Affairs Doctrine Bars California Insider Trading Claim

California, unlike the federal government, has codified its prohibition on insider trading.  Corporations Code Section 25402 provides:

Court Concludes CUTSA Does Not Preempt Breach Of Fiduciary Duty Claim

The California Uniform Trade Secrets Act (CUTSA) provides various remedies for misappropriation of a trade secret (as defined). The legislature, however, was "vexingly oblique" in prescribing the effect of CUTSA on common law claims, such as...

Court Holds No "Continuous Director" Status Required Under Nonprofit Law

The California Supreme Court has imposed a continuous ownership requirement for shareholder derivative suits under California Corporations Code Section 800.  Grosset v. Wenaas, 42 Cal. 4th 1100 (2008). Thus, a shareholder must maintain continuous...