Keith Paul Bishop

Keith Paul Bishop

Keith Bishop works with privately-held and publicly-traded companies on federal and state corporate and securities transactions, compliance, and governance matters. He is highly-regarded for his in-depth knowledge of the distinctive corporate and regulatory requirements faced by corporations in the state of California. While many law firms have a great deal of expertise in federal or Delaware corporate law, Keith’s specific focus on California corporate and securities law is uncommon. A former California state regulator of securities and financial institutions, Keith has decades of experience navigating the regulatory-intensive state’s rules. For companies with substantial operations in California but incorporated elsewhere, Keith is an exceptional resource. He is frequently called in to help with issues arising under California’s “blue sky” and lender laws. An avid writer, Keith’s blog, www.calcorporatelaw.com, covers a diverse collection of California corporate and securities law issues and has served as a valued resource for other attorneys, business executives, judges, and media, nationwide.

Recent Posts

Has Your Promissory Note Been Outlawed?

The modern understanding of the term "outlaw" is someone who has broken the law and has not been captured and brought to justice. There is, however, another sense of the term. A note is said to be "outlawed" when the statute of limitations no longer...

Is Forced Speech In Responding To Staff Comment Letters Inaccurate Speech?

In 2014, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced that all comment letters would request that the issuer include the so-called "Tandy Letter".  Thus, all staff comment letters include a request for a written statement in haec verba:

Simple Majority Voting And The Magna Carta

Some activists are continuing to submit stockholder proposals seeking the implementation of "simple majority voting".  For example,  Morgan Stanley's 2016 proxy statement includes the following proposal from Newground Social Investment, SPC:

Why Delaware Corporations Should Worry About California Law When Making Dividends

When paying a dividend to shareholders, California corporations are subject to Chapter 5 of the California Corporations Code. Corporations incorporated in Delaware and other states may also be subject to Chapter 5 if they meet the conditions of...

Plaintiffs Find California Courts Congenial To Section 11 Actions

Muttering About Mottoes

Inspecting Foreign Corporation Shareholder Lists

Recently, I've written about the "absolute" right of shareholders to inspect the shareholders list pursuant to California Corporations Code Section 1600. Readers at, or representing, foreign corporations may have skipped these posts as inapposite to...

Federal Court Rules "Mere Affiliation" Is Insufficient To Establish Personal Jurisdiction

Nearly four years ago, I wrote about a Nevada Supreme Court decision holding that Nevada courts can exercise personal jurisdiction over nonresident officers and directors who directly harm the corporation.  Consipio Holding, BV v. Carlberg, 282 P.3d...

More On Inspecting The Shareholder List And The Regulation Of Alien Implants

Yesterday's post discussed California's "absolute" right of shareholders to inspect the shareholder list established by Section 1600 of the California Corporations Code.  Some additional points are briefly worth noting:

Inspecting The Shareholder List

Section 1600(a) of the California General Corporation Law establishes the "absolute right" of a shareholder or shareholders to inspect the shareholder list.  To be eligible to exercise this right, the shareholder or shareholders must hold at least: