Keith Paul Bishop

Keith Paul Bishop

Keith Bishop works with privately-held and publicly-traded companies on federal and state corporate and securities transactions, compliance, and governance matters. He is highly-regarded for his in-depth knowledge of the distinctive corporate and regulatory requirements faced by corporations in the state of California. While many law firms have a great deal of expertise in federal or Delaware corporate law, Keith’s specific focus on California corporate and securities law is uncommon. A former California state regulator of securities and financial institutions, Keith has decades of experience navigating the regulatory-intensive state’s rules. For companies with substantial operations in California but incorporated elsewhere, Keith is an exceptional resource. He is frequently called in to help with issues arising under California’s “blue sky” and lender laws. An avid writer, Keith’s blog, www.calcorporatelaw.com, covers a diverse collection of California corporate and securities law issues and has served as a valued resource for other attorneys, business executives, judges, and media, nationwide.

Recent Posts

The California Political Contribution Case That 19 Law Professors Missed

Earlier this week, I wrote about an amicus curiae brief submitted by 19 law school professors Friedrichs v. Cal. Teachers Ass'n, a case now pending before the United States Supreme Court. In particular, I questioned whether these academics properly...

CalPERS To Consider Support For Corporate Political Spending Disclosure Mandate

Next week, the California Public Employees Retirement System will consider a staff recommendation "to update the legislative and policy guidelines to include support for Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rulemaking on disclosure of the use of...

Did 19 Law Professors Get The Business Judgment Rule Wrong?

In yesterday's post, I wrote about the amicus curiae brief filed by 19 law school professors in Friedrichs v. California Teachers Ass'n, a case now pending before the United States Supreme Court. Being a California corporate lawyer, I was interested...

What 19 Eminent Law Professors Would Have You Believe

UCLA Law School Professor Stephen Bainbridge yesterday highlighted an amicus curiae brief filed recently by 19 law professors in Friedrichs v. California Teachers Ass'n.  That case, which is now pending before the U.S. Supreme Court, is concerned...

Why The Capitol Is In The Capital

Article III, Section 2 of the California Constitution provides that "Sacramento is the capital of California". The building in which the legislators meet, however, is denominated the "capitol" building. Thus, the state capitol can be found in the...

I'm Guessing That The DOL Didn't Have in Mind Negative Weighing Of ESG Factors

In this post, I noted a recent study by Professor Tracie Woidtke at the University of Tennessee concluding that social-issue shareholder-proposal activism appears to be negatively related to firm value. I therefore raised the question of whether the...

A Hollow Nickel, Hollywood And Texas Gulf Sulphur

If you've taken a course in securities law, you've undoubtedly heard of, and I hope have read, SEC v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co., 401 F.2d 833 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 976 (1968). That case is famous for the Second Circuit Court of Appeals'...

What's So Special About An 80% Doing Business Threshold?

In yesterday's post, I dipped into the SEC's proposed amendments to Rule 147, a safe harbor for intrastate offerings exempt from registration pursuant to Section 3(a)(11) of the Securities Act of 1933. Among other things, the SEC is proposing to...

Rule 147 Changes May Cause Uptick In California Securities Qualifications

As has been widely noted, the Securities and Exchange Commission has proposed amending Rule 147 under the Securities Act of 1933. That Rule provides a safe harbor for compliance with the Section 3(a)(11) exemption from registration for intrastate...