In this May 10, 2011 post, I wrote that U.S. District Court Judge Jeffrey S. White had ruled that privity is required under Section 25500. Louisiana Pacific Corp. v. Money Mkt. 1 Institutional Inv. Dealer, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P96,262 (March 28,...
Recent Posts
It's a good situation when you can make the rules for everyone else but immunize yourself from those same rules.
Last week, I wrote about the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeal's decision in Business Roundtable v. SEC which vacated Rule 14a-11. Obviously, the decision was a victory for the Business Roundtable and the Chamber of Commerce and a stinging loss for the...
Today, the United States District Court of Appeals issued its opinion in the challenge to Rule 14a-11 by the Business Roundtable and Chamber of Commerce. The Court of Appeals vacated the rule finding that the Securities and Exchange Commission acted...
Privity is one those requirements that isn't intrinsically interesting and yet it is extremely important. Over the last year, I've written several posts discussing the privity requirement (or lack thereof) under the Corporate Securities Law of 1968,...
On Monday, I mentioned the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (aka the "CISG"). The CISG generally applies to contracts for the sale of goods when the parties have their places of business in different...
The California legislature went into recess on July 15. Several bills that would amend the California Corporations Code await action when the legislators return on August 15. However, the legislature has already enacted and the Governor has signed a...
Why read the papers when you can watch the video?
