Keith Paul Bishop

Keith Paul Bishop

Keith Bishop works with privately-held and publicly-traded companies on federal and state corporate and securities transactions, compliance, and governance matters. He is highly-regarded for his in-depth knowledge of the distinctive corporate and regulatory requirements faced by corporations in the state of California. While many law firms have a great deal of expertise in federal or Delaware corporate law, Keith’s specific focus on California corporate and securities law is uncommon. A former California state regulator of securities and financial institutions, Keith has decades of experience navigating the regulatory-intensive state’s rules. For companies with substantial operations in California but incorporated elsewhere, Keith is an exceptional resource. He is frequently called in to help with issues arising under California’s “blue sky” and lender laws. An avid writer, Keith’s blog, www.calcorporatelaw.com, covers a diverse collection of California corporate and securities law issues and has served as a valued resource for other attorneys, business executives, judges, and media, nationwide.

Recent Posts

Commissioner Takes Emergency Action To Put More Time On The Clock For Rule 260.204.9

Yesterday, Commissioner Preston DuFauchard started the process for adding six months to the lifespan of Rule 260.204.9. The Commissioner took this action in light of the imminent expiration of the “private adviser” exemption set forth in Section...

CalPERS Responds

Earlier this week, I wrote about the many scandals that have been swirling about the California Public Employees Retirement System. A good sign that an organization is feeling embattled is when it sets up a website dedicated to providing responses....

Dinner Is Served: Will The Volcker Rule Spur Interest In California's Capital Access Company Law?

Congress issues an invitation 

Supreme Court Resolves Janus Controversy But The Gates of War Are Not Entirely Closed

Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative Traders. In a 5-4 decision, the Court found that to be liable under Rule 10b-5, a person must "make" the material misstatement. According to...

CalPERS' Annus Horribilis: How Much Worse Will It Get?

The news keeps getting worse for the nation's largest public pension fund - the California Public Employees Retirement System.  On Saturday, Los Angeles Times reporter Marc Lifsher reported in this story that CalPERS has adopted a policy of...

Are Reverse Mergers A Nevada Problem?

Yesterday, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued this bulletin on the risks of investing in reverse merger companies.  In this post from the week before, I wrote about a recent article that found that Nevada is second only to Delaware in...

Offering Securities By General Announcement Without Registration

Yesterday, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued this announcement regarding its settlement with two advertising executives who launched a campaign to buy a beer company through a solicitation of investors on Facebook and Twitter without...

Section 25501.5 - "A Riddle, Wrapped In A Mystery, Inside An Enigma"

Last December, I wrote this post about Corporations Code § 25501.5 that asked "What do it mean?". In general, the statute authorizes an action for rescission (or damages, if the security is no longer owned) by any person “who purchases a security...

What To Do When Your Business Entity Has Been Wrongfully Terminated

People make mistakes.  Some mistakes, such as dialing a wrong number, can be fixed with no lasting damage.  Other mistakes, such as Fred Merkle's base running error in 1908, can never be undone.