Keith Paul Bishop

Keith Paul Bishop

Keith Bishop works with privately-held and publicly-traded companies on federal and state corporate and securities transactions, compliance, and governance matters. He is highly-regarded for his in-depth knowledge of the distinctive corporate and regulatory requirements faced by corporations in the state of California. While many law firms have a great deal of expertise in federal or Delaware corporate law, Keith’s specific focus on California corporate and securities law is uncommon. A former California state regulator of securities and financial institutions, Keith has decades of experience navigating the regulatory-intensive state’s rules. For companies with substantial operations in California but incorporated elsewhere, Keith is an exceptional resource. He is frequently called in to help with issues arising under California’s “blue sky” and lender laws. An avid writer, Keith’s blog, www.calcorporatelaw.com, covers a diverse collection of California corporate and securities law issues and has served as a valued resource for other attorneys, business executives, judges, and media, nationwide.

Recent Posts

"Time Cools, Time Clarifies" - The CSL's Cooling Off Statute

The Corporate Securities Law of 1968 does not provide for a general "cooling off" period in which a purchaser of securities may cancel the transaction for any reason. However, the Department of Corporations in 2000 sponsored legislation, SB 1837...

Commissioner Extends Comment Period On Investment Adviser Rule Changes

As posted last month, the Commissioner of Corporations has issued an invitation for comment on possible changes to California's investment adviser rules. The deadline for submitting comments was set to expire this week. Just before year end,...

CalPERS Responds (Slowly) To PRA Request for Rule 14a-8 Letters

Last November, I submitted a Public Records Act request for all letters sent by the California Public Employees Retirement System to companies with respect to CalPERS' submission of a shareholder proposal pursuant to Securities and Exchange...

More on Secondary Trading in Private Company Securities

Last April, I wrote this brief piece for the Daily Journal regarding the emerging phenomenon of secondary trading in securities of issuers not subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Since that time, interest...

"Can You Do Division? Divide A Loaf By A Knife - What's The Answer To That?"

In People v. Collins, 68 Cal. 2d 319 (1968), the California Supreme Court wrote that it could "discern no inherent incompatibility between the disciplines of law and mathematics". While the Supreme Court may be correct about the relationship between...

Damaging Your Cable Box May Violate The Corporations Code

Your team is ahead but makes a crucial error and loses the game. You may be tempted to vent your frustration on the cable box. Before you do, you should stop and consider Section 14400 of the California Corporations Code. That section allows a cable...

"O Hateful Error" - What To Do When You Find A Mistake In Your Section 25102(f) Filing

Yesterday, I wrote about electronic filings of notices of exemption under Corporations Code Section 25102(f) and 10 CCR § 260.103.

Electronic Filing of Section 25102(f) Notices

For the last five years, the Commissioner of Corporations has required that notices of exemption filed pursuant to Corporations Code § 25102(f) be filed electronically, except in cases of demonstrable hardship. See 10 CCR § 260.102.14(f). Electronic...

Thinking About Converting? You May Need The Commissioner's Approval!

In 1999, the Business Law Section of the California State Bar sponsored AB 197 (Ackerman). That bill established a comprehensive scheme under the California Corporations Code for the conversion of limited partnerships and limited liability companies...