Keith Paul Bishop

Keith Paul Bishop

Keith Bishop works with privately-held and publicly-traded companies on federal and state corporate and securities transactions, compliance, and governance matters. He is highly-regarded for his in-depth knowledge of the distinctive corporate and regulatory requirements faced by corporations in the state of California. While many law firms have a great deal of expertise in federal or Delaware corporate law, Keith’s specific focus on California corporate and securities law is uncommon. A former California state regulator of securities and financial institutions, Keith has decades of experience navigating the regulatory-intensive state’s rules. For companies with substantial operations in California but incorporated elsewhere, Keith is an exceptional resource. He is frequently called in to help with issues arising under California’s “blue sky” and lender laws. An avid writer, Keith’s blog, www.calcorporatelaw.com, covers a diverse collection of California corporate and securities law issues and has served as a valued resource for other attorneys, business executives, judges, and media, nationwide.

Recent Posts

Court Orders Discovery In Derivative Action Challenging Racial Diversity

Last year, the City of Pontiac General Employees' Retirement System filed a derivative suit against the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Cisco Systems, Inc. The gist of the complaint was that the "Defendants publicly misrepresented...

What Is So Special About A "Special Proceeding"?

Several provisions of the California General Corporation Law provide for "special proceedings" in the Superior Court. One such provision is Section 1800 which allows certain persons to bring an action for the involuntary dissolution of the...

Why California Requires Notice Of Rights That Shareholders May Not Have

Dissenters' rights under California's General Corporation Law do not exist unless there are "dissenting shares", a term defined in Section 1300(b) of the California Corporations Code. In order to qualify as "dissenting shares" under the statute, the...

When Half A Loaf May Not Suffice

Section 1900(a) is the only provision of the California General Corporation Law that authorizes action by an exactly 50% vote of shareholders. This action, moreover, may be taken without any action on the part of a corporation's board of directors....

Looking For Stiffer Loan Terms?  Nevada May Be Able To Help

Nevada's corporation law is quite protective of directors and officers.  Following the Delaware Supreme Court's decision in Smith v. Van Gorkum, 488 A.2d 858 (1985), the Nevada legislature amended the law to allow for exculpation of directors and...

Court Finds No Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Director Of California Corporation

Frank Hemm, a citizen of Switzerland, served on the board of directors of Rodo Medical, Inc., a California corporation. He was also an executive of Institut Straumann AG, a Swiss corporation and investor in Rodo. Mr. Hemm attended Rodo board...

When A Majority Vote May Not Suffice

The California General Corporation Law imposes an intricate set of rules with respect to shareholder approval of reorganizations (defined in Section 181). In general, the GCL requires that the principal terms of a reorganization be "approved by the...

When A Director Is Removed, Can The Shareholders Fill The Vacancy By Written Consent?

When a director is removed from the board of a California corporation, a "vacancy" is created. Cal. Corp. Code § 192. The board of directors cannot fill the vacancy unless the board is authorized to do so in the articles of incorporation or a bylaw...

Federal Circuit Holds Board Of Directors As A Separate Entity

We often hear about a board of directors being sued, but can a plaintiff really sue a corporation's board?   According to a recent decision by the Federal Circuit,  a plaintiff can't sue a board, at least not as a separate entity in federal court: