Contact us with your California corporate & securities law questions (949) 353-6347 or Contact us here

Does Section 415 Derogate The Exclusivity Of The Appraisal Remedy?

Section 415 of the California Corporations Code provides that nothing in the General Corporation Law "shall be construed as a derogation of any rights or remedies of a creditor or shareholder may have against any … shareholder, director, officer or the corporation because of participation in any fraud or illegality practiced upon such … shareholder in connection with the issue or sale of shares …".  Section 1312(a), however, expressly limits the rights of shareholders who have dissenters' rights to attack, set aside or rescind a merger or reorganization.   Does Section 415 render Section 1312(a) a nullity?

That was the argument advanced in Steinberg v. Amplica, 42 Cal. 3d 1198 (1986).  The California Supreme Court, however, disagreed, finding that "it proves too much".  Instead, it held that "section 415 was not intended by the Legislature to apply the remedies of a minority shareholder in connection with a merger and that the appraisal statutes, including Section 1312(a), govern those rights".  

Share on:

General Corporation Law

ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING CALIFORNIA CORPORATE AND SECURITIES LAW? CONTACT US DIRECTLY

We offer expert advice with the intricacies of California law.

Our years of experience and expertise allow us to help clients navigate the business laws in California.

CONTACT US

ABOUT OUR AUTHOR

30172DBAB0084D3A8F39D7AF0A8E79BC.ashx Keith Paul Bishop
Partner at Allen Matkins
(949) 353-6328
 Contact me
Learn More About Keith

RECOGNITION
JD Supra Readers Choice Top Author 2020

NationalLawReview



nominee-badge

Get the latest news and analysis about California Corporate & Securities law. Subscribe to our newsletter today!

We respect your email privacy

CATEGORIES

see all

YOUTUBE

FACEBOOK