California Corporate & Securities Law

Recently, I came to consider the potential ambiguity in the word "nonplussed".  The word originally meant to be confused or perplexed, as in:

Last week, Broc Romanek posed the question "whether it’s okay to use footnotes when you write".  My question for today is whether it is legal to use footnotes.  It turns out that this is a question that the California legislature has actually...

California's first limited liability company act was known as the Beverly-Killea Limited Liability Company Act, former Corporations Code Section 17000 et seq.  In 2012, the legislature replaced it with the ill conceived California Revised Uniform...

Recently, I proposed that it may be a Sisyphean job to get courts to recognize that a limited liability company is not a limited liability corporation much less a corporation. Judicial confusion over nomenclature has been a favorite topic of...

A recent ruling by U.S. District Court Judge Cynthia Bashant reminds us that when it comes to securities fraud claims, a plaintiff is generally required to have either bought or sold a security.  Melcher v. Fried, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89353. 

Last week, President Donald Trump intimated that he may pardon Martha Stewart who was famously convicted and served time in prison for obstruction of justice. Ms. Stewart's notorious conviction arose out of an insider trading investigation of her...

Professor Joshua Fershee has been fighting the good fight on limited liability company nomenclature, but I fear that he is losing. For example, the following appeared in a recent U.S. Magistrate's ruling denying a plaintiff's application to serve a...

NantKwest, Inc. describes itself as "a pioneering clinical-stage immunotherapy biotechnology company headquartered in San Diego, California with certain operations in Culver City and El Segundo, California and Woburn, Massachusetts". It also happens...