California Corporate & Securities Law

Closing arguments are scheduled to begin this morning at 10:00 a.m. (California) in the first trial of the constitutionality of California's female director quota law, SB 826.  The trial began last December before Los Angeles Superior Court Judge ...

In the course of thousands of quotidien posts over more than a decade, I have made my share of typographical, grammatical and lexigraphical errors. I always appreciate it when readers point these out so that they can be corrected. This week, several...

In many closely held corporations, the directors may work side by side nearly every day.  If they all meet  and discuss some action, does that count as a meeting of the board of directors?  

Professor Stephen Bainbridge recently controverted the following assertion that Dodge v. Ford Motor Co. does not represent the law of Michigan: 

In this post, Professor Stephen Bainbridge posits that the Delaware Supreme Court incorrectly decided Fliegler v. Lawrence, 361 A.2d 218 (Del. 1976) by requiring that stockholder approval of conflicted transaction requires a majority vote of the...

Liz Dunzhee wrote yesterday in the Mentor Blog:

As the trial of of the constitutionality of SB 826, California's female director quota, law continues, the question of the plaintiffs' standing remains in contention.  As I reported in June of last year, Judge Maureen Duffy-Lewis previously overruled...

California's female director quota law was on trial last week.  According to Brian Melley, a reporter for the Associated Press, a witness from the Secretary of State's office testified "It’s required but there’s no penalty, so it’s essentially...

SB 826 is scheduled to go on trial today before Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Maureen Duffy-Lewis.  Crest v. Weber, Cal. Super. Ct. Case No. 19STCV27561. SB 826 requires all publicly held corporations headquartered in California to have at least...