California, unlike the federal government, has codified its prohibition on insider trading. Corporations Code Section 25402 provides:
Last May, I wrote about U.S. District Court Judge Arthur D. Spatt's ruling in Hatteras Enters. v. Forsythe Cosmetic Grp., Ltd., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68792. That post concerned Judge Spatt's decision to apply California's Corporate Securities Law of...
John Jenkins at the The Mentor Blog wrote this morning about the Securities and Exchange Commission's relaxed approach to remedying unregistered initial coin offerings (aka ICOs). According to John, the SEC is allowing an unregistered ICO to remedy...
The California Commissioner of Business Oversight is require to prepare an annual report summarizing the data collected from issuers that were granted permits to offer and sell securities pursuant to Corporations Code § 25113(b). The Commissioner...
John Jenkins at DealLawyers.com recently wrote about Section 11 claims being filed in state court by purchasers in stock-for-stock mergers. Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 authorizes a cause of action against specified persons "in case any...
After starting employment at eCommission Solutions, LLC in 2015, Mr. Aja Doshi was offered the position of Vice President, Product Engineering. Among other things, the offer stated: "You will be granted one hundred fifty thousand (150,000) stock...
Recently, I came across a very helpful table on the SEC's website. The table illustrates which offerings exempt from Section 5 of the Securities Act may be subject to state registration or qualification requirements:
Last Friday's post concerned liability under Section 12(a) of the Securities Act of 1933. As noted in the post, Section 12(a)(2), unlike Section 12(a)(1), is an antifraud statute. It imposes liability on any person who: