Keith Paul Bishop

Keith Paul Bishop

Keith Bishop works with privately-held and publicly-traded companies on federal and state corporate and securities transactions, compliance, and governance matters. He is highly-regarded for his in-depth knowledge of the distinctive corporate and regulatory requirements faced by corporations in the state of California. While many law firms have a great deal of expertise in federal or Delaware corporate law, Keith’s specific focus on California corporate and securities law is uncommon. A former California state regulator of securities and financial institutions, Keith has decades of experience navigating the regulatory-intensive state’s rules. For companies with substantial operations in California but incorporated elsewhere, Keith is an exceptional resource. He is frequently called in to help with issues arising under California’s “blue sky” and lender laws. An avid writer, Keith’s blog, www.calcorporatelaw.com, covers a diverse collection of California corporate and securities law issues and has served as a valued resource for other attorneys, business executives, judges, and media, nationwide.

Recent Posts

Court Holds Corporations Have No Constitutional Privacy Right, But . . .

Article I, Section 1 of the California Constitution provides that "all people" have an inalienable right of privacy. Does this right extent to corporations? Seemingly it would if corporations are considered "people". Some might cite the U.S. Supreme...

Resource Extraction Payments Disclosure: "I've Information Vegetable, Animal, and Mineral"

Section 13(q) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 directed the SEC to issue rules requiring resource extraction issuers to include in an annual report information relating to any payment made by the issuer, a subsidiary of the issuer, or an...

"Not De Minimis" Is No Small Thing!

Having failed to meet a Congressional deadline for years, a federal court last fall ordered the Securities and Exchange Commission to adopt a resource extraction payments disclosure rule as required by Section 13(q) of the Securities Exchange Act. ...

What The SEC Doesn't Understand About Blue Sky Laws

I recently submitted this comment letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to its proposal to modernize the exemption applicable to intrastate offerings. The SEC somewhat misleadingly describes its proposal as " "amendments to...

Court Applies Safe Harbor Doctrine To CA Transparency in Supply Chains Act

I first wrote about the California Transparency in Supply Chains Act more than four years ago.  See California To Require Website Disclosure Regarding Efforts To Eradicate Slavery And Human Trafficking. At the time, I noted that "The Act provides...

Do Indemnity Agreements Constitute Unlicensed And Unlawful Insurance?

Parties to all sorts of agreement negotiate over the allocation of risk. A seller, for example, might sell goods at a higher price with a full warranty and at a lower price with no warranty. A corporate officer may insist on higher compensation in...

Blasphemous Corporate Names

Yesterday's post considered the question of whether the California Secretary of State could refuse to accept offensive corporate names. Blasphemous corporate names constitute a subset of offensive names because they are offensive to believers....

Can The Secretary Of State Reject Disparaging Business Entity Names?

Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act bars the Patent and Trademark Office from registering scandalous, immoral, or disparaging marks. 15 U.S.C. § 1052(a).  However, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit sitting en banc recently held...

Court Of Appeal Finds Indemnity Includes First Party Claims

Three years ago, I wrote this brief post about how to interpret an indemnity claim. I wrote that post to remind readers that the California Civil Code not only defines "indemnity", it provides a series of interpretational rules. According to the...