Keith Paul Bishop

Keith Paul Bishop

Keith Bishop works with privately-held and publicly-traded companies on federal and state corporate and securities transactions, compliance, and governance matters. He is highly-regarded for his in-depth knowledge of the distinctive corporate and regulatory requirements faced by corporations in the state of California. While many law firms have a great deal of expertise in federal or Delaware corporate law, Keith’s specific focus on California corporate and securities law is uncommon. A former California state regulator of securities and financial institutions, Keith has decades of experience navigating the regulatory-intensive state’s rules. For companies with substantial operations in California but incorporated elsewhere, Keith is an exceptional resource. He is frequently called in to help with issues arising under California’s “blue sky” and lender laws. An avid writer, Keith’s blog, www.calcorporatelaw.com, covers a diverse collection of California corporate and securities law issues and has served as a valued resource for other attorneys, business executives, judges, and media, nationwide.

Recent Posts

Court Decides Successor In Merger May Enforce Arbitration Clause

Can a party to written agreement that does not include an arbitration clause enforce an arbitration provision in another agreement to which it is not a party? Boiled down to the essentials, this is the question decided yesterday by the Court of...

How Many Signatures Are Required For An Agreement of Merger?

Corporations Code Section 313 generally provides that a contract, note or other instrument will not be invalidated as to a corporation by any lack of authority if it is signed by the corporation's chairman of the board, the president or any vice...

Is The FTB's Argument Nothing More Than Blowing In The Wind?

Readers may remember this blog post from September of last year: Nevada Supreme Court Upholds Fraud Verdict Against The California Franchise Tax Board.  The subject of the post was Franchise Tax Bd. v. Hyatt, 335 P.3d 125 (Nev. 2014) in which the...

Section 12(g)(1)(A) - How The SEC Is Putting Words In Congress' Mouth

Section 501 of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act amended Section 12(g)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to increase the thresholds for mandatory registration of a class of equity securities. The Securities and Exchange...

Sellers May Find The FAST Act To Be Not So Fast

I've devoted several recent posts to the new secondary trading exemption that Congress tacked on to Section 4 of the Securities Act of 1933. The exemption is poorly drafted and in many cases may prove unusable. Perhaps this reflects its provenance...

Court Holds Extrinsic Evidence Was Inadmissible

As generally understood, the parol evidence rule prohibits the introduction of extrinsic evidence to alter, vary or add to the terms of an integrated agreement. “Parol” is derived from the French word, “parole” meaning speech. The parol evidence...

Congress' Strange New Secondary Trading Exemption

Yesterday's post introduced new Section 4(a)(7) of the Securities Act of 1933, as added by the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act or the “FAST Act”. Boiled down to the essentials, this is a secondary trading exemption. This is made clear by...

Strawberries and Raspberries - Truly Strange Bedfellows

When I served as Deputy Secretary and General Counsel of the California Business, Transportation & Housing Agency, the Departments of Transportation and Corporations were part of that agency. As a result, my days often involved a concatenation of...

Why Courts Should Give The Legislature The Benefit Of The Doubt

Like many others, I'm a huge fan of Justice William W. Bedsworth's column, "A Criminal Waste of Space"Today's post was inspired by Justice Bedsworth's most recent column bemoaning the misplaced instinct of lawyers from their nonage to their dotage...