Keith Paul Bishop

Keith Paul Bishop

Keith Bishop works with privately-held and publicly-traded companies on federal and state corporate and securities transactions, compliance, and governance matters. He is highly-regarded for his in-depth knowledge of the distinctive corporate and regulatory requirements faced by corporations in the state of California. While many law firms have a great deal of expertise in federal or Delaware corporate law, Keith’s specific focus on California corporate and securities law is uncommon. A former California state regulator of securities and financial institutions, Keith has decades of experience navigating the regulatory-intensive state’s rules. For companies with substantial operations in California but incorporated elsewhere, Keith is an exceptional resource. He is frequently called in to help with issues arising under California’s “blue sky” and lender laws. An avid writer, Keith’s blog, www.calcorporatelaw.com, covers a diverse collection of California corporate and securities law issues and has served as a valued resource for other attorneys, business executives, judges, and media, nationwide.

Recent Posts

Investors Claim Failure To Qualify Justifies Issuer's Return Of Investment

The remedy for failure to qualify the sale of a security is either rescission or damages. Cal. Corp. Code § 25503. Thus, one typically expects to see investors alleging a failure to qualify as grounds for returning their investments. In a recent...

Welcome To California: No Foreign Corporations Need Apply

California continues to hemorrhage corporate charters to Delaware and Nevada.  The most recent potential emigrant is SJW Corp. which filed this proxy statement last week seeking shareholder approval of a reincorporation from California to Delaware....

Substantial, Systematic, And Continuous Contacts Do Not Establish General Jurisdiction

California courts may exercise personal jurisdiction over nonresidents "on any basis not inconsistent with the Constitution of this state or of the United States". Code Civ. Proc. § 410.10. Seventy years ago, Chief Justice Harlan Fiske Stone...

District Court Refuses To Halt SEC Administrative Proceedings

While serving as General Counsel to California's Business, Transportation & Housing Agency, I was from time to time asked to respond to ersatz summons and other documents issued by "Our One Supreme Court". Given that these "courts" existed only in...

Covenants Not To Compete - By The Numbers

In a recently published article, three professors undertook an empirical analysis of noncompetition and other restrictive postemployment covenants in public company Chief Executive Officer contracts.  Norman D. Bishara, Kenneth J. Martin, and Randall...

Did The Judge's Ruling Truly Decimate The Defendant's Contention?

Yesterday's post concerned Justice M. Kathleen Butz' recent holding in Yee v. Am. Nat’l Ins. Co., 2015 Cal. App. LEXIS 257 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015). The case involved the California Controller's attempt to examine the records of American National...

Controller Must Still "Look To Find A Reason To Believe"

Last month, I wrote about reports that the SEC is seeking years of employment agreements, nondisclosure agreements and other documents in an effort to ferret out possible restraints on whistleblowers.  See Is Anything Fishy With The SEC’s...

Should The SEC Adopt Governance Principles (For Itself)?

When I served as Commissioner of Corporations for the State of California, I was sometimes asked about the other Commissioners. However, I never concerned myself with the "other Commissioners" because there were no other Commissioners. Unlike some...

Section 25501.5 - I Ask Again What Do It Mean?

Corporations Code Section 25501.5 generally authorizes an action for rescission (or damages, if the security is no longer owned) by any person “who purchases a security from or sells a security to a broker-dealer that is required to be licensed and...