Keith Paul Bishop

Keith Paul Bishop

Keith Bishop works with privately-held and publicly-traded companies on federal and state corporate and securities transactions, compliance, and governance matters. He is highly-regarded for his in-depth knowledge of the distinctive corporate and regulatory requirements faced by corporations in the state of California. While many law firms have a great deal of expertise in federal or Delaware corporate law, Keith’s specific focus on California corporate and securities law is uncommon. A former California state regulator of securities and financial institutions, Keith has decades of experience navigating the regulatory-intensive state’s rules. For companies with substantial operations in California but incorporated elsewhere, Keith is an exceptional resource. He is frequently called in to help with issues arising under California’s “blue sky” and lender laws. An avid writer, Keith’s blog, www.calcorporatelaw.com, covers a diverse collection of California corporate and securities law issues and has served as a valued resource for other attorneys, business executives, judges, and media, nationwide.

Recent Posts

California's Other Securities Law

A year ago, I discussed the question of whether an issuer could prevent unauthorized trading in options with respect to its own securities.  See "Options Trading Without the Issuer's Consent". In fact, one issuer tried, without success, to stop...

No Complaint Window At Many State Agencies

John Milton is one of my favorite writers.  In his influential defense of freedom of speech, Areopagitica, he linked liberty to the right to complain about the government:

Why Does CalPERS Need Insider Trading Rules?

Last Spring, I wrote that the California Public Employees Retirement System was considering adoption of regulations governing personal trading by members of its Board of Administration and employees. These regulations are still under consideration....

Aren't All Administrative Decisions Precedential?

As lawyers, we are used to citing earlier decisions as precedent. Thus, we might expect that the Department of Corporations is free to rely on its earlier administrative decisions as precedent. Surprisingly, this is not the case. In fact, the...

Revealed! The Investor Advisory Committee's Recommendations On Lifting The General Solicitation Ban In Rule 506 Offerings

I was not the only one who was perturbed by the Investor Advisory Committee's procedures for considering the Securities and Exchange Commission's proposed rulemaking to lift the ban on general solicitation and Advertising in Rule 506 offerings....

Who Opens And Closes The Polls?

One of the seemingly routine matters at stockholder meetings is the opening and closing of the polls.  Sometimes, votes are close and the outcome of a vote may turn on whether the polls are closed "early" or "late".  For a real-life example, see In re...

Government In The Shadows

Last Friday, I lamented the inadequacy of the notice given by the Investor Advisory Committee for the Securities and Exchange Commission. Not only was notice very short - three days; it requested comments on materials unavailable to the public - the...

Court Holds Promoters May Owe Fiduciary Duties To Non-Shareholder Investors And A Lamentable Example Of Notice

Yesterday, the California Court of Appeal issued an opinion addressing two important questions involving the liability of corporations and promoters  Cleveland v. Johnson, Cal. Ct. of Appeal Case No. B233762 (Oct. 11, 2012). The facts of the case are...

What If The Police Received A Bonus For Every Ticket They Wrote?

I've been attending (and speaking as a panelist at) the National Association of Stock Plan Professionals (NASPP). One of the panels discussed the important, but arcane topic of state unclaimed property (aka escheat) laws. Coincidentally, Volume 5,...