Keith Paul Bishop

Keith Paul Bishop

Keith Bishop works with privately-held and publicly-traded companies on federal and state corporate and securities transactions, compliance, and governance matters. He is highly-regarded for his in-depth knowledge of the distinctive corporate and regulatory requirements faced by corporations in the state of California. While many law firms have a great deal of expertise in federal or Delaware corporate law, Keith’s specific focus on California corporate and securities law is uncommon. A former California state regulator of securities and financial institutions, Keith has decades of experience navigating the regulatory-intensive state’s rules. For companies with substantial operations in California but incorporated elsewhere, Keith is an exceptional resource. He is frequently called in to help with issues arising under California’s “blue sky” and lender laws. An avid writer, Keith’s blog, www.calcorporatelaw.com, covers a diverse collection of California corporate and securities law issues and has served as a valued resource for other attorneys, business executives, judges, and media, nationwide.

Recent Posts

The NAFTA, Preemption And Where In the World Are The Reservations?

Earlier, I wrote this post about the exemption from registration found in Section 3(a)(2) of the Securities Act for "any security issued or guaranteed by any bank". For purposes of this statute, a "bank" generally means "any national bank, or any...

Nevada Business Entity Law Changes Are Now In Effect

Nevada's legislature meets only in odd number years and then for only 120 calendar days (2,880 hours).  Nev. Const. Art. 4, § 2(2). This year, the legislature enacted SB 405, which makes numerous changes, large and small, to the Nevada's business...

Corporate Ownership Disclosure Again In The Crosshairs

Nevada Secretary of State Announces Task Force

A Miscellany For The Head Of The Year

Unincorporated Associations

Does California's Anti-Waiver Statute Void Choice Of Forum Agreements?

California Corporations Code Section 25701 is derived from Section 410(g) of the Uniform Securities Act (1956). Section 25701 voids any condition, stipulation or provision purporting to bind any person acquiring any security to waive compliance with...

Court of Appeal Decides Buy-Out Questions Under Re-RULPA

California's Uniform Limited Partnership Act of 2008, commonly known as Re-RULPA, established a mechanism by which partners can avoid a judicial dissolution of the partnership by purchasing for cash the partnership interest owned by the partners...

Thinking About Joining A Club? You May Want To Consider These Corporations Code Provisions First

In Democracy in America, Alexis de Tocqueville devoted an entire chapter to the propensity of Americans to form associations.  In particular, he observed:

California's Fairness Opinion Requirement For Interested Party Proposals

In 1968, Congress enacted the Williams Act to regulate tender offers. Two decades later, the California legislature enacted Corporations Code Section 1203 to impose additional requirements on tender offers and other specified transactions by an...

Without Knowing The Reasons, Issuers Can't Take Account Of Say-on-Pay Votes

The recently completed proxy season has yielded a virgin crop of shareholder "say-on-pay" votes, as required by Section 951 of the Dodd-Frank Act. Although not required by Congress, the Securities and Exchange Commission amended Item 402(b)(1) of...