Keith Paul Bishop

Keith Paul Bishop

Keith Bishop works with privately-held and publicly-traded companies on federal and state corporate and securities transactions, compliance, and governance matters. He is highly-regarded for his in-depth knowledge of the distinctive corporate and regulatory requirements faced by corporations in the state of California. While many law firms have a great deal of expertise in federal or Delaware corporate law, Keith’s specific focus on California corporate and securities law is uncommon. A former California state regulator of securities and financial institutions, Keith has decades of experience navigating the regulatory-intensive state’s rules. For companies with substantial operations in California but incorporated elsewhere, Keith is an exceptional resource. He is frequently called in to help with issues arising under California’s “blue sky” and lender laws. An avid writer, Keith’s blog, www.calcorporatelaw.com, covers a diverse collection of California corporate and securities law issues and has served as a valued resource for other attorneys, business executives, judges, and media, nationwide.

Recent Posts

Court of Appeal Decides Buy-Out Questions Under Re-RULPA

California's Uniform Limited Partnership Act of 2008, commonly known as Re-RULPA, established a mechanism by which partners can avoid a judicial dissolution of the partnership by purchasing for cash the partnership interest owned by the partners...

Thinking About Joining A Club? You May Want To Consider These Corporations Code Provisions First

In Democracy in America, Alexis de Tocqueville devoted an entire chapter to the propensity of Americans to form associations.  In particular, he observed:

California's Fairness Opinion Requirement For Interested Party Proposals

In 1968, Congress enacted the Williams Act to regulate tender offers. Two decades later, the California legislature enacted Corporations Code Section 1203 to impose additional requirements on tender offers and other specified transactions by an...

Without Knowing The Reasons, Issuers Can't Take Account Of Say-on-Pay Votes

The recently completed proxy season has yielded a virgin crop of shareholder "say-on-pay" votes, as required by Section 951 of the Dodd-Frank Act. Although not required by Congress, the Securities and Exchange Commission amended Item 402(b)(1) of...

Confession Is Good For Soul And Equilibrium But Maybe Not Justice

Recently, I read this article about how the Department of Labor, the Internal Revenue Service and states are targeting pay practices of home builders. This got me thinking about how industry enforcement sweeps can be a very effective enforcement...

The Missing Link In LLC Formations

When a corporation is formed under the California General Corporation Law, an incorporator (or incorporators) signs the initial articles of incorporation and files them with the California Secretary of State. Corporations Code § 200(a). The articles...

Why Corporations Receive Shareholder Proposals

Recently, I spoke at an "essentials" program presented by the Society of Corporate Secretaries and Governance Professionals. I was asked to speak on "what is corporate governance"? In my view, practitioners are so caught up in the details of...

Should A Proxy Card Specify A Choice Of Law?

One of the jobs of an inspector of election is to determine the validity and effect of proxies.  See, e.g., Cal. Corp. Code § 707(b) and 8 Del. Code § 231(b)(2). However, the validity and effect of proxies will depend upon state law. I'm guessing...

Federal Preemption And Bank Securities: Was The Commissioner's Order Really Necessary?

The August 2011 Monthly Bulletin published by the Department of Financial Institutions recently arrived in my inbox. One article caught my eye and caused me to revisit the status of state regulation of the offer and sale of bank securities in light...