Keith Paul Bishop

Keith Paul Bishop

Keith Bishop works with privately-held and publicly-traded companies on federal and state corporate and securities transactions, compliance, and governance matters. He is highly-regarded for his in-depth knowledge of the distinctive corporate and regulatory requirements faced by corporations in the state of California. While many law firms have a great deal of expertise in federal or Delaware corporate law, Keith’s specific focus on California corporate and securities law is uncommon. A former California state regulator of securities and financial institutions, Keith has decades of experience navigating the regulatory-intensive state’s rules. For companies with substantial operations in California but incorporated elsewhere, Keith is an exceptional resource. He is frequently called in to help with issues arising under California’s “blue sky” and lender laws. An avid writer, Keith’s blog, www.calcorporatelaw.com, covers a diverse collection of California corporate and securities law issues and has served as a valued resource for other attorneys, business executives, judges, and media, nationwide.

Recent Posts

In Flanders Fields

Today is Veterans Day.  The date commemorates the ending of the First World War on November 11, 1918 at 11:00 a.m.  The following year, President Woodrow Wilson proclaimed the first "Armistice Day", as it was then known:

Approval By The Outstanding Shares - When California's Default Rule Doesn't Apply

My posts this week have been dedicated to voting issues.  On Monday, I wrote about California's default rule for shareholder action - California Corporations Code § 602(a).  This is a default rule because it is subject to a greater vote requirement...

If ISS' Proposed Political Spending Updates Are Adopted, We'll All Be Wearing A Size 14*

The ISS Global Policy Board recently solicited comments with respect to its proposed updates to its benchmark proxy voting guidelines. One of the policy changes under consideration relates to corporate political spending disclosure proposals. Under...

San Francisco And Portland (Me) Do What The SEC Refused To Do

Section 951 of the Dodd-Frank Act requires companies that are subject to the SEC’s proxy rules to include in their proxy statements “a separate resolution subject to shareholder vote” to determine whether a shareholder vote on executive compensation...

A California Twist On Shareholder Action

After last week's presentation on "Did it Pass?" at the National Association of Stock Plan Professionals' 19th Annual Conference, I'm planning to devote a few posts to the subject of shareholder voting. Living in a democracy, we all feel that we...

Kudos For California's Commissioner Of Corporations

The North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA) describes itself as "the oldest international investor protection organization". It is comprised of 67 state, provincial, and territorial securities administrators in the 50 states,...

Was Your Option Plan Approved? Corporate Law May Say "Yes", But The Securities Law May Say "No"

On Friday, I'll be part of a panel at the National Association of Stock Plan Professionals' 19th Annual Conference.  My topic will be devoted to the question "Did it pass?".  Here's a brief preview of some of the subtleties in this question.

ISS Thinks Only Those Who Vote "No" Have A View

ISS Calls For Comments

New California Law To Impose A Scarlet "M" On Employers

Some California employers may soon be joining Elizabeth Pain and her more famous, albeit fictional, sister in shame, Hester Prynne.  On October 9, 2011, Governor Jerry Brown signed SB 459 (Corbett) into law. Among other things, this bill adds Section...