Keith Paul Bishop

Keith Paul Bishop

Keith Bishop works with privately-held and publicly-traded companies on federal and state corporate and securities transactions, compliance, and governance matters. He is highly-regarded for his in-depth knowledge of the distinctive corporate and regulatory requirements faced by corporations in the state of California. While many law firms have a great deal of expertise in federal or Delaware corporate law, Keith’s specific focus on California corporate and securities law is uncommon. A former California state regulator of securities and financial institutions, Keith has decades of experience navigating the regulatory-intensive state’s rules. For companies with substantial operations in California but incorporated elsewhere, Keith is an exceptional resource. He is frequently called in to help with issues arising under California’s “blue sky” and lender laws. An avid writer, Keith’s blog, www.calcorporatelaw.com, covers a diverse collection of California corporate and securities law issues and has served as a valued resource for other attorneys, business executives, judges, and media, nationwide.

Recent Posts

Forming A Benefit Or Flexible Purpose Corporation? Some Pitfalls To Avoid

In previous blogs, I've noted the appearance of two new types of California corporations - the flexible purpose corporation and the benefit corporation. Because the laws creating both of these forms took effect on January 1, organizers have been...

Ninth Circuit Strikes Down Choice Of State Of Incorporation Law

No one puts a choice of law provision at the beginning of a contract. They are nearly always relegated to the boilerplate provision at the end. This placement often belies their critical importance. Cases are lost or won on the basis of the choice...

Is California's Economic Impact Analysis Requirement "Illusory And Ineffective"?

Recent court decisions have faulted the Securities and Exchange Commission for failing to assess adequately the economic impact of proposed regulations. Last year, the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals spared no words in its assessment of the SEC's...

APA Amendments Cause Extension Of Rule 260.204.9 Comment Period

Last December, I wrote this post concerning the Commissioner's proposed amendments to Rule 260.204.9.   This rule provides an exemption from registration for investment advisers to certain private funds. The rule as currently in effect was adopted as...

Initiative Seeks To Dehumanize Corporations In California

Are corporations "persons"? The California Corporations Code answers this question quite directly in Section 18 which defines "person" as including corporations and natural persons. The Corporate Securities Law of 1968 goes even further - defining...

Louis D. Brandeis Takes On Section 310

Before being named to the U.S. Supreme Court, Justice Louis D. Brandeis wrote an influential series of articles for Harpers Weekly magazine. Eventually, these articles were collected and published under the title "Other People's Money--and How the...

11/11/11 Was A Record Day For Section 25102(f) Filings!

I've previously written about California's on-line database for securities filings which is known as Cal-EASI (See "California's Big EASI").  Recently, I noticed what is very likely to be a record busting day for Section 25102(f) filings.

You Say Article 2A, I Say Division 10

When taking a law school exam, you generally have some idea of the legal area being tested. If you show up for a final exam in contracts, you wouldn't expect to be questioned about criminal procedure. Unfortunately, subject areas are not so clearly...

One-Size-Fits-All Policy Is A Misfit

Today, Forbes.com ran my Op/Ed on ISS' recent decision to adopt a one-size-fits-all approach to recommendations on shareholder proposals with respect to political spending disclosures.