A California LLC Endures Forever, A Nevada LLC Not So Long

California's Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act endows limited liability companies with a certain level immortality.  Corporations Code Section 17707.06(a) provides:

Brutus Was An Honorable Man But Was He Also A Stupid One?

Today's post is a digression into Roman history and etymology, two of my long-time interests. 

The Attorney-Client Privilege In M&A Transactions - A Decade Later

In 2013, then Chancellor Leo Strine determined that under Section 259 of the Delaware General Corporation Law the attorney-client privilege held by the target company follows to the surviving company after a merger.   Great Hill Equity Partners IV, LP...

California May Soon Define "Corporation" To Include Entities Are Decidely Not Corporations

The California Corporations Code is a misnomer. While the Corporations Code does in fact govern corporations, it also governs a wide variety of unincorporated entities, including general partnerships, limited partnerships, and limited liability...

Another Delaware Publicly Traded Company Proposes A Nevada Move

Last week, Chromocell Therapeutics Corporation filed preliminary proxy materials that included a proposal to reincorporate in Nevada.  Rather than convert, the company is proposing to effect the reincorporation by means of a merger with and into a...

Is Your Directors And Officers Liability Coverage Illusory?

Many corporations pay significant amounts for directors and officers liability policies. Commonly referred to as D&O policies, these policies usually involve three sides. Directors and officers are likely to have the most interest in "Side A"...

After More Than A Year, Questions Remain Regarding Caremark and Officers

Last year, Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster famously held that officers could be subject to liability under the Caremark doctrine.  In re McDonald’s Corp., 289 A.3d 343 (Del. Ch. Jan. 26, 2023).    The Caremark doctrine originally held that directors...

Still More On Whether The SEC Exceeded Its Authority In Adopting Rule 21F-17

Yesterday's post again discussed whether the Securities and Exchange Commission exceeded its authority in adopting Rule 21F-17(a), which provides:

SEC Settles More Rule 21F-17(a) Cases, But Has It Exceeded Its Authority?

In a blog post this morning, Liz Dunshee notes that the Securities and Exchange Commission has recently announced the settlement seven more cases involving Rule 21F-17(a), which provides: