The NSMIA Didn't Lay A Preemptive Finger On These Transactions

Last week, I was in Washington D.C. where I served as the moderator of a panel discussion on current securities law issues for small business. As part of my presentation, I discussed the following list of securities transactions that have not been...

Ninth Circuit Holds Private Company Rules Preempt California Law

California's Statutory Prohibition on Forced Patronage

Delaware Supreme Court Upholds Federalism, Comity & Finality

In Delaware Court of Chancery “Overrules” Federal Court, I discussed Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster's opinion in Louisiana Municipal Police Employees’ Retirement System v. Pyott, C.A. No. 5795-VCL (Del. Ch. June 11, 2012). In that opinion, the...

The FTB's "Doing Business" Trap For Foreign LLCs With California Managers, Members Or Agents

According to the California Franchise Tax Board, a limited liability company classified as a partnership must do all of the following:

California Bill Would Expand Liability For Securities Fraud, Impose New Fees, Expand Commissioner's Powers

In late February, Senator Jerry Hill introduced a bill, SB 538, to substantially amend the Franchise Investment Law.  A few days later, the bill was read for the first time and set for hearing by the Senate Banking and Financial Institutions Committee

Nevada Legislature Considers Bill To Authorize Forum Selection Charter Provisions

Late last month, the Nevada Committee on Judiciary introduced a bill that would, among numerous other things, authorize forum selection provisions in corporate and other Nevada entity charters. If SB 441 is enacted, a management person or owner of...

Political Spending Disclosure Bill Set For First Committee Hearing Today

In January, I wrote about Senator Noreen Evans bill, SB 121, that would require any corporation (as defined)  that has shareholders located in California and that makes a contribution or expenditure (as defined):

Federal Court Sides With Second DCA In Privity Split

In Moss v. Kroner, 197 Cal. App. 4th 860 (2011), the Second District Court of Appeal found that rescission was available to a plaintiff under Corporations Code Section 25504 even though the plaintiff was not in privity with the defendant. Section...

Bill Aims To Free Subversive Organizations From Registration Law And NASAA Shoots For Mandatory Form D Filings

Is It Subversive To Borrow Money From A Foreign Government?