Keith Paul Bishop

Keith Paul Bishop

Keith Bishop works with privately-held and publicly-traded companies on federal and state corporate and securities transactions, compliance, and governance matters. He is highly-regarded for his in-depth knowledge of the distinctive corporate and regulatory requirements faced by corporations in the state of California. While many law firms have a great deal of expertise in federal or Delaware corporate law, Keith’s specific focus on California corporate and securities law is uncommon. A former California state regulator of securities and financial institutions, Keith has decades of experience navigating the regulatory-intensive state’s rules. For companies with substantial operations in California but incorporated elsewhere, Keith is an exceptional resource. He is frequently called in to help with issues arising under California’s “blue sky” and lender laws. An avid writer, Keith’s blog, www.calcorporatelaw.com, covers a diverse collection of California corporate and securities law issues and has served as a valued resource for other attorneys, business executives, judges, and media, nationwide.

Recent Posts

Do Indemnity Agreements Constitute Unlicensed And Unlawful Insurance?

Parties to all sorts of agreement negotiate over the allocation of risk. A seller, for example, might sell goods at a higher price with a full warranty and at a lower price with no warranty. A corporate officer may insist on higher compensation in...

Blasphemous Corporate Names

Yesterday's post considered the question of whether the California Secretary of State could refuse to accept offensive corporate names. Blasphemous corporate names constitute a subset of offensive names because they are offensive to believers....

Can The Secretary Of State Reject Disparaging Business Entity Names?

Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act bars the Patent and Trademark Office from registering scandalous, immoral, or disparaging marks. 15 U.S.C. § 1052(a).  However, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit sitting en banc recently held...

Court Of Appeal Finds Indemnity Includes First Party Claims

Three years ago, I wrote this brief post about how to interpret an indemnity claim. I wrote that post to remind readers that the California Civil Code not only defines "indemnity", it provides a series of interpretational rules. According to the...

Preemption Of Secondary Trading Is Fast Becoming More Obscure

Secondary trading of securities in California must be qualified unless exempt or not subject to qualification due to federal preemption. Cal. Corp. Code § 25130. Similarly, the offer and sale of securities are subject to registration under the...

Initiative Measure Aims To Retard Gut And Amend Legislation

A reader of the California Constitution would be lead to believe that the course of legislation is orderly and predictable. Under Article IV, Section 8(b), the legislature may make no law except by statute and no statute except by bill. Every bill,...

Staff Releases Report on its Review of the Definition of “Accredited Investor”

On Friday, the Securities and Exchange Commission staff published a report of its review of the definition of "accredited investor". Congress directed the SEC to review the definition every four years in Section 413(b)(2)(A) of the Dodd-Frank Wall...

Can In-House Counsel Have Sexual Relations With His Or Her Client?

Can an in-house lawyer have sexual relations with his or her client?  To answer this question, it is necessary to identify the lawyer's client.  The California Rules of Professional Conduct provide a clear answer to this question:

Court Decides Successor In Merger May Enforce Arbitration Clause

Can a party to written agreement that does not include an arbitration clause enforce an arbitration provision in another agreement to which it is not a party? Boiled down to the essentials, this is the question decided yesterday by the Court of...